2010
DOI: 10.1109/twc.2010.05.081191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the throughput performance of multirate IEEE 802.11 networks with variable-loaded stations: analysis, modeling, and a novel proportional fairness criterion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, finding this number is a complex task which falls into the WiFi QoS research field. There is a plethora of analytical models of the IEEE 802.11 mac behaviour [32][33][34][35]. In most models, the central variable is the probability that an observed station attempts to transmit in a random time slot ( ).…”
Section: Guaranteed Qos Voip Service and Energy Expenditure In Wifi Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, finding this number is a complex task which falls into the WiFi QoS research field. There is a plethora of analytical models of the IEEE 802.11 mac behaviour [32][33][34][35]. In most models, the central variable is the probability that an observed station attempts to transmit in a random time slot ( ).…”
Section: Guaranteed Qos Voip Service and Energy Expenditure In Wifi Nmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This seriously decreases the system throughput in order to attain throughput fairness. Although some works [4,12] have resolved this problem, their attainable maximum throughputs are still quite limited due to the primitive 802.11 MAC protocols. Finally, proportional fairness (PF) [2,7,9,17,22], as it balances between fairness and throughput, has emerged as a prominent candidate for downlink OFDMA-based networks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is envisaged that by employing a distribution coordination function [2][3], to evaluate the channel conditions that determine the data rates and taking into consideration the effect of interference on a basic service set [4] there is a potential to correct the fairness level using dynamic network allocation vectors and forcing handoffs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%