LEXeter '83: Proceedings 1984
DOI: 10.1515/9783111593166-005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|
Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
47
0
24

Year Published

1988
1988
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
47
0
24
Order By: Relevance
“…Wiegand (1984) se oorspronklike uiteensetting van die bestek en omvang van die terrein van woordeboeknavorsing, asook die herbevestiging daarvan in Wiegand (1998), ken vier hoofkomponente daaraan toe, te wete woordeboekgebruiksnavorsing, kritiese woordeboeknavorsing, historiese woordeboeknavorsing en sistematiese woordeboeknavorsing (vergelyk in hierdie verband ook Wiegand 1998:118 en Schierholz 2016. Gegee die navorsing van die onlangse jare en die sterk fokus op 'n woordeboekkultuur, kan daar met reg daarop aanspraak gemaak word dat woordeboekkultuur formeel binne die terrein van woordeboeknavorsing erken moet word.…”
Section: Woordeboekdidaktiek In 'N Omvattende Woordeboekkultuur Read unclassified
“…Wiegand (1984) se oorspronklike uiteensetting van die bestek en omvang van die terrein van woordeboeknavorsing, asook die herbevestiging daarvan in Wiegand (1998), ken vier hoofkomponente daaraan toe, te wete woordeboekgebruiksnavorsing, kritiese woordeboeknavorsing, historiese woordeboeknavorsing en sistematiese woordeboeknavorsing (vergelyk in hierdie verband ook Wiegand 1998:118 en Schierholz 2016. Gegee die navorsing van die onlangse jare en die sterk fokus op 'n woordeboekkultuur, kan daar met reg daarop aanspraak gemaak word dat woordeboekkultuur formeel binne die terrein van woordeboeknavorsing erken moet word.…”
Section: Woordeboekdidaktiek In 'N Omvattende Woordeboekkultuur Read unclassified
“…This became the greatest source of confusion regarding the disciplinary status of lexicography, with linguists generally regarding lexicography as part of socalled 'applied linguistics'. That lexicography is not part of linguistics was first challenged by Wiegand (1984) who argued that it was a professional activity and a scientific practice whose object was not language but the production of dictionaries. He also argued that dictionaries were utility products with each having its own genuine purpose, thereby making the user an important variable in the whole enterprise.…”
Section: A Lexicographical Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this regard it is important to look at the different components of theoretical lexicography, e.g. as indicated by Wiegand (1984), and to refer to participants in these different components of theoretical lexicography as metalexicographers. But how does the scope of the term lexicographer compare to that of theoretical lexicography?…”
Section: Theoretical Lexicographersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Apart from these references to the existence of and need for more or less general theories, in the academic literature quite a lot of references to more specific lexicographical theories can also be found, e.g. a theory of bilingual lexicog-raphy (Duda et al 1986), a theory of the lexicographical example (Hausmann 1985 andZöfgen 1987), a theory of lexicographical language description (Wiegand 1983), a theory of the dictionary form (Wiegand and Morán 2009), etc. It is therefore simply wrong when it is claimed that no lexicographical theory exists although everybody is welcome to accept, critize or reject the existing theories but not to deny or ignore their existence.…”
Section: Lexicographical Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%