Recent Advances in Operator Theory 2001
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-0348-8323-8_12
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Spectrum of Unbounded Off-diagonal 2 × 2 Operator Matrices in Banach Spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Throughout this section let A and G be (possibly unbounded and/or non‐invertible) selfadjoint operators in the Hilbert space \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\begin{document}\pagestyle{empty}$(\mathcal H,(\cdot \,,\cdot ))$\end{document}. Each of the statements in the following proposition follows from or is an easy consequence of 15, Remark 2.5] and 15, Theorem 1.1], see also 16, 32.…”
Section: Products Of Selfadjoint Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Throughout this section let A and G be (possibly unbounded and/or non‐invertible) selfadjoint operators in the Hilbert space \documentclass{article}\usepackage{amssymb}\begin{document}\pagestyle{empty}$(\mathcal H,(\cdot \,,\cdot ))$\end{document}. Each of the statements in the following proposition follows from or is an easy consequence of 15, Remark 2.5] and 15, Theorem 1.1], see also 16, 32.…”
Section: Products Of Selfadjoint Operatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof. It was proved in [3] and [4] that, under these hypotheses, ST and T S are densely defined, (ST ) * = T * S * and (T S) * = S * T * . Also, by [9], 1 dom (ST ) + ST has dense range if and only if 1 dom (T S) + T S has dense range.…”
Section: Indeed For Every Givenmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We should also note that, in our approach (i.e., S and T are adjoint to each other), the matrices M −S,T and M S,−T are both symmetric. In some earlier work the role of these matrices has been played by some 2 × 2 symmetric offdiagonal matrices (see, for example, [3,4,6,15,18]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first of our main objectives is to show that (t2) implies (t1) and is accomplished in Theorem 3.1. Our main tool here is a Banach-space result from [6]. Our second aim is to prove analogues of central results of [15] assuming-instead of (t3)-that the operator T [ * ] T is only definitizable over a subset Ω of C (see Definition 3.8).…”
Section: F Philipp a C M Ran And M Wojtylak Ieotmentioning
confidence: 99%