2016
DOI: 10.1038/jp.2016.124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the same page: a novel interprofessional model of patient-centered perinatal consultation visits

Abstract: OBJECTIVE To plan and implement an interprofessional collaborative care clinic for women in midwifery care needing a consultation with a maternal-fetal medicine specialist. DESIGN A community-engaged design was used to develop a new model of collaborative perinatal consultation which was tested with 50 women. Participant perinatal outcomes and semi-structured interviews with 15 women (analyzed using qualitative descriptive analysis) and clinic providers were used to evaluate the model. RESULT Participant p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(23 reference statements)
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Demographic characteristics of eligible women, separated into declined and consented groups, are displayed in Table 1. Our consented sample was consistent with the racial/ethnic distribution of women who received prenatal care at this practice (Phillippi et al, 2016). Of eligible women, all racial/ethnic groups were equally likely to consent to participation after screening.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Demographic characteristics of eligible women, separated into declined and consented groups, are displayed in Table 1. Our consented sample was consistent with the racial/ethnic distribution of women who received prenatal care at this practice (Phillippi et al, 2016). Of eligible women, all racial/ethnic groups were equally likely to consent to participation after screening.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…When women who received prenatal care at one of three recruitment clinics met inclusion criteria for the clinical trial, a nurse or midwife described the study. If the woman was interested and gave permission, the nurse or midwife sent a message within the electronic medical record portal to the investigator, who called the woman to explain the study, screen for eligibility, and discuss risks and benefits of participation (Phillippi et al, 2016). After telephone discussion, a link to the e-consent form was emailed via REDCap to eligible, interested women.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While qualitative methods allow researchers latitude on data collection to answer the research questions, new qualitative researchers may need prompting on how to collect field notes that provide robust context and facilitate later data analysis. We used our review of the literature, both peer-reviewed articles and books, as well as our own research experiences (Lauderdale & Boyle, 1994; Phillippi, Holley, Payne, Schorn, & Karp, 2016; Phillippi, Holley, Schorn, et al, 2016; Phillippi, Myers, & Schorn, 2014; Struthers, Lauderdale, Nichols, Tom-Orme, & Strickland, 2005), to create a guide to the content of qualitative field notes. Institutional review board approval was not required for this work as only publicly available literature was reviewed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After development and adjustment based on feedback from women, nurses, midwives, physicians, and administrators, the planning checklist was implemented as part of a new model of collaborative consultations. This new model in which the woman, a midwife from her original practice of choice, and a maternal‐fetal medicine specialist meet together simultaneously was tested for feasibility with 50 women, and the planning checklist was used to guide each visit . The perinatal outcomes of the women who received care during feasibility testing are reported in a previous publication .…”
Section: Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This new model in which the woman, a midwife from her original practice of choice, and a maternal‐fetal medicine specialist meet together simultaneously was tested for feasibility with 50 women, and the planning checklist was used to guide each visit . The perinatal outcomes of the women who received care during feasibility testing are reported in a previous publication . To assess the value and effectiveness of the checklist, interviews with women, nurses, midwives, and physicians were conducted by the primary author after implementation of the new model.…”
Section: Processmentioning
confidence: 99%