2007
DOI: 10.1002/smj.639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the role of acquisition premium in acquisition research

Abstract: Several studies argue that paying high acquisition premia is value destroying for acquirer shareholders. There are studies that have even used the size of premium as a measure of low‐quality decision making. This paper departs from the earlier research and shows that acquisition premia may be justified when target firms' resources are difficult for the market to value. An analysis of a sample of 458 acquisitions demonstrates that although higher premia are paid for R&D‐related assets, the premia do not cause n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
127
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 138 publications
(139 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
6
127
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Considerable research has therefore been dedicated to the factors behind overpayment (e.g. Krishnan, Hitt, & Park, 2007;Laamanen, 2007) or misevaluation of the acquired firm (e.g. Alexandridis, Antoniou, & Petmezas, 2007).…”
Section: Pricementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Considerable research has therefore been dedicated to the factors behind overpayment (e.g. Krishnan, Hitt, & Park, 2007;Laamanen, 2007) or misevaluation of the acquired firm (e.g. Alexandridis, Antoniou, & Petmezas, 2007).…”
Section: Pricementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scholars have also stressed that inflexible HR systems and socio-cultural mechanisms often hinder the capacity to translate such variance in values, beliefs and practices into effective knowledge transfer in M&A (Sarala, Junni, Cooper, & Tarba, 2014 on such issues as payment method and price (e.g. Harford, 1999;Laamanen, 2007). Decision scholars have addressed the effects of human biases on the acquisition process, including hubris and overconfidence (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…An acquisition premium is the price paid for a target firm that exceeds its pre-acquisition market value. Over the past 20 years, the average premium paid has been 40%-50% (Laamanen, 2007).…”
Section: Acquisition Premiumsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Capability design during the M&A evaluation process helps managers decide "what capabilities we will need in order to achieve our goals and how the target helps us create those capabilities." Enhancing firms' capabilities is an important goal of many M&A, often cases with large acquisition premiums (Laamanen 2007;Uhlenbruck et al 2006;Berry 2006;Hasan et al 2011).…”
Section: Capability Design Methods: High Uncertainty and Low Controversymentioning
confidence: 99%