2015 IEEE 81st Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/vtcspring.2015.7145975
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Potential of Full Duplex Communication in 5G Small Cell Networks

Abstract: Full duplex communication promises a 100% throughput gain by doubling the number of simultaneous transmissions. In a multi-cell scenario, increasing the number of simultaneous transmissions correspondingly increases the number of interference streams observed at a particular receiver. As such, the potential throughput gain may not be 100% as promised. In this study, we evaluate the performance of full duplex communication in a dense small cell scenario as targeted by future 5th Generation (5G) radio access tec… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
(14 reference statements)
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another solution being proposed is the full duplex transmission [65], where there is no separation in time or frequency between downlink and uplink, and all subframes may be used in both directions at the same time, and the self interference (SI) has to be canceled by a combination of analog and digital processing. However, SI supression and cancellation are complex tasks, based in costly hardware design and digital signal processing [66].…”
Section: B New Frame Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another solution being proposed is the full duplex transmission [65], where there is no separation in time or frequency between downlink and uplink, and all subframes may be used in both directions at the same time, and the self interference (SI) has to be canceled by a combination of analog and digital processing. However, SI supression and cancellation are complex tasks, based in costly hardware design and digital signal processing [66].…”
Section: B New Frame Structuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [10], the performance of IBFD in a dense small cell network was evaluated and compared against the conventional half duplex transmission. It is argued in [10] that IBFD provides 30-40% mean throughput gain over the half duplex for indoor scenarios. The 100% throughput gain is only noticed when the cells are isolated by extremely high wall loss figures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors of [11] arrived to the conclusion that there is a strong need for a MAC protocol for IBFD wireless networks that intelligently switches between IBFD and half duplex based on different network configurations. However, both APs and mobile stations (MSs) are assumed to have IBFD capabilities in [10] and [11]. As we discussed earlier, it is far from being a realistic assumption considering the size limitation of the handheld devices.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A number of studies analyzes the FD performance in small cell scenarios [12][13][14][15][16][17][18] and in a macro cell network [19] based on interference levels, disregarding the type of traffic in the network. In [12], the gain that FD provides compared to HD, assuming ideal SIC, is analyzed from a signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) perspective.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both works analyze the SINR region where FD outperforms HD, concluding that in highly interfered scenarios, switching between FD and HD provides the optimal results. In [15], the FD throughput performance using different types of receivers and ideal SIC in a multi-cell scenario is studied. Results show an average throughput gain of 30-40%.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%