2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.micron.2015.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the morphology of cellulose nanofibrils obtained by TEMPO-mediated oxidation and mechanical treatment

Abstract: The morphological properties of cellulose nanofibrils obtained from eucalyptus pulp fibres were assessed. Two samples were produced with the same chemical treatment (NaClO/NaBr/TEMPO (2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl radical) oxidation), but distinct mechanical treatment intensities during homogenization. It was shown that the nanofibrils production yield increases with the mechanical energy. The effect of mechanical treatment on the yield was confirmed by laser profilometry of air-dried nanocellulose film… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
44
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This fact has been reported previously by several authors (Besbes et al 2011b;Chaker et al 2013;González et al 2014;DelgadoAguilar et al 2015a). Both the yield of nanofibrillation and the transmittance are much lower than for TEMPO-oxidized CNF, a fact that reveals that the morphology of the CNF from this study is substantially different (Besbes et al 2011a;González et al 2012González et al , 2014Delgado-Aguilar et al 2015a, d;Gamelas et al 2015). Moreover, the cationic demand of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers is much higher than for enzymatic CNFs, being about 1200 leq g/g for those with an oxidation degree of 5 mmol sodium hypochlorite (González et al 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…This fact has been reported previously by several authors (Besbes et al 2011b;Chaker et al 2013;González et al 2014;DelgadoAguilar et al 2015a). Both the yield of nanofibrillation and the transmittance are much lower than for TEMPO-oxidized CNF, a fact that reveals that the morphology of the CNF from this study is substantially different (Besbes et al 2011a;González et al 2012González et al , 2014Delgado-Aguilar et al 2015a, d;Gamelas et al 2015). Moreover, the cationic demand of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibers is much higher than for enzymatic CNFs, being about 1200 leq g/g for those with an oxidation degree of 5 mmol sodium hypochlorite (González et al 2014).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…The light scattering is reduced as the fibers are fibrillated to optically inactive nanofibrils (diameters less than 100 nm) and the networks are compacted, as is the case with CNF films. 60 The oxygen barrier of the films is appropriate for packaging applications, 7 specifically for samples FS_T3.8, FHS_T6.0, and FS_T6.0. However, in most cases, nanocellulose materials contain residual fibers that are poorly fibrillated and thus scatter light.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This fact strongly affects the aspect ratio ( L / d ) of the resulting nanocellulose crystals . On the other hand, variation in the levels of lignin, hemicelluloses, or other compounds like pectin affects the processing steps and pretreatments required for fibrillation which consequently has an effect on the properties of CNFs . Figure shows a wide range of nanocelluloce (CNCs and CNFs) derived from different sources.…”
Section: Starting Materials For Fabricating Functional and Engineeredmentioning
confidence: 99%