2013
DOI: 10.1140/epjd/e2013-40103-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the localization of Rydberg wave packets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is somewhat surprising since Eq. (11) indicates that the triplet interaction should dominate and since Λ-Σ conversion is stronger for the triplet in most interactions. For NLO19 and Jülich '04, the 1 + state has a larger Σ-probability which is more in line with naive expectations.…”
Section: Three-and Four-body Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is somewhat surprising since Eq. (11) indicates that the triplet interaction should dominate and since Λ-Σ conversion is stronger for the triplet in most interactions. For NLO19 and Jülich '04, the 1 + state has a larger Σ-probability which is more in line with naive expectations.…”
Section: Three-and Four-body Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…for ρ in the order of two-to-three times that of normal nuclear matter [10]. For such an interaction the onset for hyperon formation in neutron stars could be shifted to rather high densities, a feature that appears to be promising as a possible explanation for the so-called hyperon puzzle [11]. The latter refers to the still unsolved question how one can reconcile the softening of the equation-of-state due to the appearance of hyperons with the observed large size (mass) of neutron stars [11][12][13][14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the longstanding open problems in nuclear physics and astrophysics that could be (if not completely at least partially) solved with the help of hy-peronic three-body forces (YTBF) is the so-called "hyperon-puzzle" of neutron stars [21,22], i.e., the difficulty to reconcile the measured masses of neutron stars with the presence of hyperons in their interiors. Hyperons are expected to appear at 2 − 3 times normal nuclear saturation density (n 0 = 0.16 fm −3 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, due to the large value of the density, new degrees of freedom are expected to appear in addition to nucleons. Examples of these new degrees of freedom widely studied include pion (Haensel & Proszynski (1982)) and kaon (Kaplan & Nelson (1986)) condensates, hyperons (Chatterjee & Vidaña (2016); Vidaña (2018)), ∆ isobars (Drago et al (2014b,a); Ribes et al (2019)), deconfined quarks (Glendenning (1992)) or even di-baryonic matter (Faessler et al (1998)). The most precise and stringent neutron star constraint on the nuclear EoS comes from the recent determination of the unusually high masses of the millisecond pulsars PSR J1614-2230 (Demorest et al (2010)), PSR J0348+0432 (Antoniadis et al (2013)) and PSR J0740+6620 (Cromartie et al (2020)).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This observational constraint rules out many of the existent EoS models with exotic degrees of freedom, although their presence in the neutron star interior is, however, energetically favorable. This has lead to puzzles like the "hyperon puzzle" (Chatterjee & Vidaña (2016)) or the "∆"puzzle (Drago et al (2014b,a)) whose solutions are not easy and presently are subject of very active research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%