1971
DOI: 10.1112/s0025579300005428
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the large sieve method in GF (q, x)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a non-zero polynomial f ∈ F q [X], we denote by rad (f ) the product of all distinct monic irreducible factors of f . To obtain an upper bound for the number of consecutive irreducible sequences of fixed length, we need the following result due to Johnsen [16,Corollary 2] on the number of irreducible polynomials over F q in an arithmetic progression.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For a non-zero polynomial f ∈ F q [X], we denote by rad (f ) the product of all distinct monic irreducible factors of f . To obtain an upper bound for the number of consecutive irreducible sequences of fixed length, we need the following result due to Johnsen [16,Corollary 2] on the number of irreducible polynomials over F q in an arithmetic progression.…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When the elements of 2 are not necessarily pairwise coprime the situation becomes more complicated. Here Johnsen [6] (see also [3] for a simpler account) has shown how to extend (1.1) to the case when 2 consists of a set of primes and their powers; but, as far as we know, the general situation has not been considered up to now. We shall prove a result (Theorem 1) which yields, under some fairly natural conditions ((1.3) and (1.4) below) on 2 and on the associated residue classes, a non-trivial upper estimate of Z.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where, since n ^ q, b{q, n) is given by (6). In general, we therefore expect v(n, t) to be approximately b(q, ri)q.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The object of this paper is to derive, using a version of the large sieve for function fields due to J. Johnsen [6], explicit lower bounds for the average number of distinct values taken by a polynomial over a finite field.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation