2022
DOI: 10.1216/jca.2022.14.515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the implicit constant fields and key polynomials for valuation algebraic extensions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a consequence, {aν}ν<λ$\lbrace a_\nu \rbrace _{\nu &lt;\lambda }$ is a pCs of transcendental type in false(K̂¯,v̂¯false)$(\overline{\widehat{K}}, \overline{\widehat{v}})$ if and only if the same holds for any other pair of sequences false{γνfalse}ν<λw¯(XK¯)$\lbrace \gamma ^\prime _{\nu ^\prime }\rbrace _{\nu ^\prime &lt;\lambda ^\prime } \subseteq \overline{w}(X-\overline{K})$ and false{aνfalse}ν<λK¯$\lbrace a^\prime _{\nu ^\prime }\rbrace _{\nu ^\prime &lt; \lambda ^\prime } \subseteq \overline{K}$ satisfying the conditions ( C 1) and ( C 2). Applying the construction in [8, Section 5], without any loss of generality, we can now assume that {aν}ν<λ$\lbrace a_\nu \rbrace _{\nu &lt;\lambda }$ and {γν}ν<λ$\lbrace \gamma _\nu \rbrace _{\nu &lt;\lambda }$ satisfy the following additional condition: false(aν,γνfalse)0.33emis a minimal pair of definition for0.33emv¯aν,γν0.33emover0.33emK.$$\begin{equation} (a_\nu ,\gamma _\nu ) \text{ is a minimal pair of definition for $\overline{v}_{a_\nu ,\gamma _\nu }$ over }K. \end{equation}$$Observe that false(trueK̂...…”
Section: Valuation Algebraic Casementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…As a consequence, {aν}ν<λ$\lbrace a_\nu \rbrace _{\nu &lt;\lambda }$ is a pCs of transcendental type in false(K̂¯,v̂¯false)$(\overline{\widehat{K}}, \overline{\widehat{v}})$ if and only if the same holds for any other pair of sequences false{γνfalse}ν<λw¯(XK¯)$\lbrace \gamma ^\prime _{\nu ^\prime }\rbrace _{\nu ^\prime &lt;\lambda ^\prime } \subseteq \overline{w}(X-\overline{K})$ and false{aνfalse}ν<λK¯$\lbrace a^\prime _{\nu ^\prime }\rbrace _{\nu ^\prime &lt; \lambda ^\prime } \subseteq \overline{K}$ satisfying the conditions ( C 1) and ( C 2). Applying the construction in [8, Section 5], without any loss of generality, we can now assume that {aν}ν<λ$\lbrace a_\nu \rbrace _{\nu &lt;\lambda }$ and {γν}ν<λ$\lbrace \gamma _\nu \rbrace _{\nu &lt;\lambda }$ satisfy the following additional condition: false(aν,γνfalse)0.33emis a minimal pair of definition for0.33emv¯aν,γν0.33emover0.33emK.$$\begin{equation} (a_\nu ,\gamma _\nu ) \text{ is a minimal pair of definition for $\overline{v}_{a_\nu ,\gamma _\nu }$ over }K. \end{equation}$$Observe that false(trueK̂...…”
Section: Valuation Algebraic Casementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Proof We have observed in [8, section 5] that we can construct sequences false{γνfalse}ν<λv(XK¯)$\lbrace \gamma _\nu \rbrace _{\nu &lt;\lambda } \subseteq v(X-\overline{K})$ and false{aνfalse}ν<λK¯$\lbrace a_\nu \rbrace _{\nu &lt;\lambda } \subseteq \overline{K}$ such that {γν}ν<λ$\lbrace \gamma _\nu \rbrace _{\nu &lt;\lambda }$ is cofinal in vfalse(XK¯false)$v(X-\overline{K})$, v(Xaν)=γν$v(X-a_\nu ) = \gamma _\nu$ and false(aν,γνfalse)$(a_\nu ,\gamma _\nu )$ is a minimal pair of definition for vaν,γν$v_{a_\nu ,\gamma _\nu }$ over K for all ν<λ$\nu &lt;\lambda$. false(Kfalse(Xfalse)false|K,vfalse)$(K(X)|K,v)$ being a valuation algebraic extension implies that false(K¯(X)false|K¯,vfalse)$(\overline{K}(X)|\overline{K},v)$ is immediate and hence γνvK¯$\gamma _\nu \in v\overline{K}$.…”
Section: Implicit Constant Fieldsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations