2015
DOI: 10.14214/sf.1220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the hidden significance of differing micro-sites on tree-ring based climate reconstructions

Abstract: 2015). On the hidden significance of differing micro-sites on tree-ring based climate reconstructions. Silva Fennica vol. 49 no. 1 article id 1220. 12 p. Highlights• Pines and spruces show growth level differences in wet and dry micro-sites with higher growth rates in the dry sites.• Spruces show a robust climate-growth relationship with June-July temperatures.• Application of collective detrending methods can bias long-term trends in climate reconstructions, if relict and recent samples originate from differe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition to the well‐established link between the summer (especially July) temperature and P. sylvestris growth in Lapland (Düthorn et al., ; Helama, ; Helama, Lindholm, Meriläinen, Timonen, & Eronen, ; Hilasvuori et al., ; McCarroll et al., ), recorded also in our setting (Figure a), the radial growth was additionally influenced by irradiance (Figure c). Observed over the three summer months, this signal was distinctly different in comparison to that of more specific influence of July temperature, thus indicating that the two climate signals represent separate temperature/irradiance responses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In addition to the well‐established link between the summer (especially July) temperature and P. sylvestris growth in Lapland (Düthorn et al., ; Helama, ; Helama, Lindholm, Meriläinen, Timonen, & Eronen, ; Hilasvuori et al., ; McCarroll et al., ), recorded also in our setting (Figure a), the radial growth was additionally influenced by irradiance (Figure c). Observed over the three summer months, this signal was distinctly different in comparison to that of more specific influence of July temperature, thus indicating that the two climate signals represent separate temperature/irradiance responses.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Concentrating on P. sylvestris data, the radial growth was found markedly reduced on wet soils, in comparison to dry substrates, in central Scandinavian mountains (Linderholm, ) and in northern Scotland (Moir et al., ). Similarly, the riparian trees exhibited reduced radial growth in comparison to dry soil microsite in northern Finland (Düthorn et al., , ), whereas in northern Sweden especially the growth of young riparian pines exceeded that of their dry soil counterparts (Düthorn et al., ). In central and south boreal settings, the growth of riparian pines have been found either increased (Düthorn et al., ) or decreased (Helama et al., ) compared to upland pines.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If not, older sections of a millennial-length chronology can have different growth rates and climate signals than those sections dominated by samples from living trees (Boswijk et al, 2014;Linderholm et al, 2014;Tegel et al, 2010). For example, remnant samples from a sub-alpine site in the Alps are ideally combined with samples from living trees growing on the same slope, at the same elevation and aspect (Neuwirth et al, 2004); sub-fossil trees from a shallow lake in Fennoscandia are ideally combined with trees growing around the lake, as opposed to drier inland locations (Düthorn et al, 2013(Düthorn et al, , 2015.…”
Section: Basic Tree-ring Chronology Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mérian et al, 2013;Osborn et al, 1997;Wigley et al, 1984), sampling design and microsite conditions (e.g. Cherubini et al, 1998;Düthorn et al, 2013Düthorn et al, , 2015Nehrbass-Ahles et al, 2014), and tree age (e.g. Carrer and Urbinati, 2004;Esper et al, 2008;Fish et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%