2010
DOI: 10.1109/tit.2010.2040941
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Hardness of Approximating Stopping and Trapping Sets

Abstract: We prove that approximating the size of stopping and trapping sets in Tanner graphs of linear block codes, and more restrictively, the class of low-density parity-check (LDPC) codes, is NP-hard. The ramifications of our findings are that methods used for estimating the height of the error-floor of moderate-and long-length LDPC codes based on stopping and trapping set enumeration cannot provide accurate worst-case performance predictions.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
37
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The lifted code in this case has length n = 990, and we are able to achieve the ACE spectrum (+∞, +∞, 17, 10,5). This improves the ACE spectrum of (+∞, +∞, 16, 9, 5) obtained in [10] for n = 1000.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The lifted code in this case has length n = 990, and we are able to achieve the ACE spectrum (+∞, +∞, 17, 10,5). This improves the ACE spectrum of (+∞, +∞, 16, 9, 5) obtained in [10] for n = 1000.…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…A full characterization of dominant trapping sets over the AWGN channel, particularly for irregular codes, is not available. It is however known that enumerating such sets, in general, is a formidable task, see, e.g., [5]. Indirect measures of the error floor performance, which are computationally more efficient, have thus been used in the design and the analysis of the LDPC codes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This dominant trapping set reduces the error floor performance of LDPC. By adding a line the following subset is identified as a graphical representation [7] So the trapping set identification and finding dominant trapping set by adding the line to the edges of check node with the lowest degree are shown. Figure (3.3a) shows that the degree of check node as two, and removing the lines from the subset graph will reduce the degrees as odd.…”
Section: Identifying Trapping Setmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is the result of input that is decoded incorrectly due to the suboptimal decoding method. Predicting troublesome inputs and the nature of the error floor require long simulations (McGregor and Milenkovic 2010).…”
Section: Zaragoza 2006)mentioning
confidence: 99%