2001
DOI: 10.1016/s0045-7825(00)00256-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the formulation of high-frequency dissipative time-stepping algorithms for nonlinear dynamics. Part I: low-order methods for two model problems and nonlinear elastodynamics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
124
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 114 publications
(130 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
4
124
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The proposed methods not only provide the correct and nieaningful energy balance for the system but show, as expected, excellent robustness as compared with standard implicit methods. We must stress that the added stability is obtained without any artificial numerical damping which, although commonly used for niultibody applications, often has the effect of breaking the symmetries of the problem and spoiling, for example, the conservation of angular momentum (Armero and Romero, 2001a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The proposed methods not only provide the correct and nieaningful energy balance for the system but show, as expected, excellent robustness as compared with standard implicit methods. We must stress that the added stability is obtained without any artificial numerical damping which, although commonly used for niultibody applications, often has the effect of breaking the symmetries of the problem and spoiling, for example, the conservation of angular momentum (Armero and Romero, 2001a).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Green-Lagrange strain tensor is (15) and (16) are evaluated for 伪 f = 1/2 without damping, such as 尉 = 0, then the energy-momentum method by Simo and Tarnow [31] is recovered for VenantKirchhoff material. Additionally, the scheme presented here is only second-order accurate when 尉 = 0, as remarked by Armero and Romero [2]. For verification and validation in the next section, this parameter is set to zero and is included in the above formulation for completeness.…”
Section: Discretisation Of Elastic Body Mechanicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other work focused on applying these algorithms to specific finite element formulations (beam and shell elements) [41,42,15,48] and multi-body systems [7,10,28]. Despite the achievement of unconditional stability, the energy conserving schemes still show difficulties for numerically stiff nonlinear problems [7, 1,2], and especially for snap-through buckling problems [31,32]. The energy conserving schemes fail to converge in the post-snap range with an acceptable time step, due to the lack of numerical dissipation for spurious high-frequency oscillations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These algorithms involve a multistage computation per time step and require solving a larger system than those solved with classical schemes, due to the coupling between the displacement and velocity. Another approach is to construct the algorithm from an energy conserving integrator [32,30,1,2,36,27]. These algorithms are designed using a specialized approximation of the element stress tensor and the velocity to ensure a positive numerical damping.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%