1997
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1476(19970710)20:10<855::aid-mma887>3.0.co;2-5
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
On the Finiteness of the Number of Determining Elements for von Karman Evolution Equations
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
16
1
0
0
Citation Types
0
10
0
0
Year Published
1998
2019
Publication Types
Select...
10
7
Relationship
0
17
Authors
Journals
Cited by 17 publications
(10 citation statements)
References 11 publications
0
10
0
0
“…For characterization of a set of determining functionals it is convenient to use the following concept of completeness defect which has been suggested in CHUESHOV [37,38] in the case of pairs of embedded Banach spaces. To consider a certain class of quasi-stable systems (see Section 3.4 below), we introduce this notion in the case of a single space equipped with an additional seminorm.…”
Section: Main Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For characterization of a set of determining functionals it is convenient to use the following concept of completeness defect which has been suggested in CHUESHOV [37,38] in the case of pairs of embedded Banach spaces. To consider a certain class of quasi-stable systems (see Section 3.4 below), we introduce this notion in the case of a single space equipped with an additional seminorm.…”
Section: Main Conceptsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is said to be the completeness defect of a set L of linear functionals on V with respect to X (see CHUESHOV [37,38]). …”
Section: Definition 333mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To characterize a set of asymptotically determining functionals, it is convenient to use the notion of the completeness defect suggested in [15,16] for the case of two embedded Banach spaces. See also [27] for the case of one space endowed with additional seminorm.…”
Section: Global Attractorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…is said to be a completeness defect of the set of linear functionals L on V with respect to X [15,16]).…”
Section: Global Attractorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can also prove the Lipschitz property in H provided one of two solutions belongs to W 2 . Proposition 1.4 Let U 1 (t) and U 2 (t) be two strong solutions to (1)- (5).…”
Section: Proposition 12 Let the Hypotheses Of Proposition 11 Be In Fo...mentioning
confidence: 99%
