2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2018.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the evolution of extreme structures: static scaling and the function of sexually selected signals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
78
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 145 publications
2
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Current reconstructions of jaw muscles in these animals place the jaw adductor origins closer to the rostral edge of the supratemporal fenestra, along the midline keel of the frill, and along the inner surface of the squamosal, with the majority of the frill, including its caudal margin, free of musculature (Dodson, 1996; Nabavizadeh, 2018). These differences in frill anatomy between early and late diverging ceratopsians prompted Makovicky (2012) and Makovicky and Norell (2006) to propose that the ceratopsian frill underwent a shift in its primary function within Neoceratopsia from providing an increased area for attachment of jaw adductor muscles as (Haas, 1955; Lull, 1908; Ostrom, 1964; Xu et al., 2002), to serving as a species‐specific display structure with possible social and/or sexual functions (Dodson, 1976, 1993, 1996; Farlow & Dodson, 1975; Hone, Naish, & Cuthill, 2012; Hone et al., 2016; Horner & Goodwin, 2006, 2008; O'Brien et al., 2018; Padian & Horner, 2011; Sampson, Ryan, & Tanke, 1997). Insertion of jaw musculature along the majority of the frill margin in early‐diverging taxa such as Liaoceratops , Yamaceratops (Makovicky & Norell, 2006), and Auroraceratops (Morshhauser et al, 2019) would likely have constrained allometric growth patterns by optimizing muscle orientations and mechanical leverage, a conclusion supported by the observed absence of ontogenetic shape change in Liaoceratops and the LCA of Neoceratopsia (Figure 7a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current reconstructions of jaw muscles in these animals place the jaw adductor origins closer to the rostral edge of the supratemporal fenestra, along the midline keel of the frill, and along the inner surface of the squamosal, with the majority of the frill, including its caudal margin, free of musculature (Dodson, 1996; Nabavizadeh, 2018). These differences in frill anatomy between early and late diverging ceratopsians prompted Makovicky (2012) and Makovicky and Norell (2006) to propose that the ceratopsian frill underwent a shift in its primary function within Neoceratopsia from providing an increased area for attachment of jaw adductor muscles as (Haas, 1955; Lull, 1908; Ostrom, 1964; Xu et al., 2002), to serving as a species‐specific display structure with possible social and/or sexual functions (Dodson, 1976, 1993, 1996; Farlow & Dodson, 1975; Hone, Naish, & Cuthill, 2012; Hone et al., 2016; Horner & Goodwin, 2006, 2008; O'Brien et al., 2018; Padian & Horner, 2011; Sampson, Ryan, & Tanke, 1997). Insertion of jaw musculature along the majority of the frill margin in early‐diverging taxa such as Liaoceratops , Yamaceratops (Makovicky & Norell, 2006), and Auroraceratops (Morshhauser et al, 2019) would likely have constrained allometric growth patterns by optimizing muscle orientations and mechanical leverage, a conclusion supported by the observed absence of ontogenetic shape change in Liaoceratops and the LCA of Neoceratopsia (Figure 7a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ecological selection; [6][7][8]). Since we currently have no way of directly assessing the function of the tusk in nature, we can use the morphological relationships of tusk size with body size to better understand the function of this exaggerated trait [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a result, the case for sexual selection in dinosaurs and other extinct reptile lineages has been controversial. In some taxa, however, there is evidence for sexual dimorphism (e.g., Shringasaurus Sengupta, Ezcurra & Bandyopadhyay, 2017) and for the presence of traits that were likely used as socio-sexual signals (O'Brien et al, 2018). Even so, the detection of sexual dimorphism is an important component of understanding sexual selection, and the current lack of evidence for dimorphism in dinosaurs (e.g., Hone, Naish & Cuthill, 2012;Mallon, 2017 and references therein) remains at least a curious anomaly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%