1968
DOI: 10.1295/koron1944.25.648
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Evaluation of the Second Virial Coefficient and Activity in Dilute Solution by Vapor Pressure Osmometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1970
1970
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
(5 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite the limited info on suitable concentration ranges, VPO has seen use at up to nearly 10% mole percent, giving solute mass fractions of over 50% . Neither the current evaluation nor earlier literature evaluations extend to those relatively high concentrations. ,,, …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite the limited info on suitable concentration ranges, VPO has seen use at up to nearly 10% mole percent, giving solute mass fractions of over 50% . Neither the current evaluation nor earlier literature evaluations extend to those relatively high concentrations. ,,, …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…11,16 Despite the reported issues, VPO can yield accurate chemical activity values and osmotic coefficients. 2,3,9,17,18 In particular, the work of Widera et al demonstrates that VPO can be more precise than direct vapor pressure measurements. One major difference from a hanging-drop type VPO is that the UIC Jupiter 833 19 uses standing thermistors with a mesh cap placed on each.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This method, developed originally for the estimation of molecular mass, has been well-established. The currently used thermistor-type vapor pressure commercial osmometers give the solvent activities rapidly, but they are usually less accurate than the alternative vapor-pressure methods . Nevertheless, vapor pressure osmometry is a suitable technique for measuring the solvent activity at a low molality.…”
Section: Experimental Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The isopiestic chamber (4) is propped from beneath at its center by a stainless steel needle (19) fixed on the perforated bottom plate (3) (see also Figure S10, Supporting Information). A low-speed gear motor ( 13) is connected to a rotating mechanism (16), which transmits rotation to the isopiestic chamber via a plastic fork (18). As a result, the isopiestic chamber makes movement that could be described as rotation around the inclined axis (precession).…”
Section: ■ Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%