1993
DOI: 10.1051/m2an/1993270607191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the discrete maximum principle for parabolic difference operators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As an application of the technique used in a proof of the AleksandrovBakelman-Pucci (ABP for short) maximum principle, Cabré pointed out in [8] (and the original paper [7] in Catalan) that the ABP method gives a simple proof of the classical isoperimetric inequality (1.1). We refer the reader, if interested in the ABP maximum principle, to [12, [16,21] for linear equations, [17] for nonlinear operators, [18,20] for parabolic cases and [19,20] for general meshes.…”
Section: ) Holds If and Only If E[ω] Is A Cube Ie E[ω]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an application of the technique used in a proof of the AleksandrovBakelman-Pucci (ABP for short) maximum principle, Cabré pointed out in [8] (and the original paper [7] in Catalan) that the ABP method gives a simple proof of the classical isoperimetric inequality (1.1). We refer the reader, if interested in the ABP maximum principle, to [12, [16,21] for linear equations, [17] for nonlinear operators, [18,20] for parabolic cases and [19,20] for general meshes.…”
Section: ) Holds If and Only If E[ω] Is A Cube Ie E[ω]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gonvergence rates for second order elliptic and parabolic equations, without any regularity assumptions, are obtained in example Krylov [8,11], Kuo and Trudinger [12], Baríes and Jacobsen [1], and Gaifarelli and Souganidis [5] and the references therein. The methods used come from regularity theory for nonlinear elliptic PDEs and are substantially more technical than the methods herein.…”
Section: Related Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also observe that on the discrete parabolic boundary of Q (h) ∩ Q ε 0 we have |v h | ≤ N ε 0 and |u (ε) K (· + t 0 , · + x 0 )| ≤ N ε 0 owing to Lemmas 2.2 and 6.1. It follows by the discrete maximum principle of Kuo and Trudinger [14] applied to v h − u (ε)…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 26mentioning
confidence: 99%