Proceedings of the 23rd ACM International Conference on Multimedia 2015
DOI: 10.1145/2733373.2806407
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Benefit of Synthetic Data for Company Logo Detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a further comparison, we report the results obtained by our solution using only FlickrLogos-32 for training and keeping all the other training choices unchanged. This results in a drop in F1-measure by 14.7% and by 4.8% in accuracy, giving an idea of the benefit of real data augmentation with respect to a purely synthetic one [14]. As a final analysis, to understand if the major source of error in our method is the Selective Search module that is unable to have a high recall or if its the CNN itself that mispredicts the logo class, we perform an additional test by adding the actual logo ground truth region to the object proposals.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a further comparison, we report the results obtained by our solution using only FlickrLogos-32 for training and keeping all the other training choices unchanged. This results in a drop in F1-measure by 14.7% and by 4.8% in accuracy, giving an idea of the benefit of real data augmentation with respect to a purely synthetic one [14]. As a final analysis, to understand if the major source of error in our method is the Selective Search module that is unable to have a high recall or if its the CNN itself that mispredicts the logo class, we perform an additional test by adding the actual logo ground truth region to the object proposals.…”
Section: Experimental Setup and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For this step, the generated charts are overlaid over real document images. Some works used similar approaches, showing results that were at par with the classic approaches [46][47][48].…”
Section: Datasetsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eggert et.al. [11] utilized CNNs to extract features from logos and determined their brand by classification with a set of Support Vector Machines (SVMs). Fast R-CNN [12] was used for the first time to retrieve logos from images by Iandola et al [20] and achieved superior results on the FlickrLogos-32 dataset [34].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%