1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4612-1702-2_2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On the Assessment of Random and Quasi-Random Point Sets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given that the goal is to minimize the variance, this expression tells us that for a given f , the most relevant discrepancy is exactly the expression (3.1). This suggests a general class of discrepancies (or figures of merit) for lattice rules, of the form [28,64,65]…”
Section: Randomization Discrepancies and Parameters Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given that the goal is to minimize the variance, this expression tells us that for a given f , the most relevant discrepancy is exactly the expression (3.1). This suggests a general class of discrepancies (or figures of merit) for lattice rules, of the form [28,64,65]…”
Section: Randomization Discrepancies and Parameters Selectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quadrature methods based on low discrepancy sets are called quasi-Monte Carlo methods. They are discussed in several review articles [3,16,41,61] and monographs [28,45,55].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uniformity of a set Ψ I is typically assessed by measuring the discrepancy between the empirical distribution of its points and the uniform distribution over (0,1) t (Niederreiter, 1992;Hellekalek and Larcher, 1998;L'Ecuyer and Lemieux, 2002). Discrepancy measures are equivalent to goodness-of-fit test statistics for the multivariate uniform distribution.…”
Section: Random Number Generationmentioning
confidence: 99%