1999
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-1425(199909/10)2:5<215::aid-jos27>3.0.co;2-y
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite
On the approximability of an interval scheduling problem
Abstract: In this paper we consider a general interval scheduling problem. The problem is a natural generalization of finding a maximum independent set in an interval graph. We show that, unless đ«=đ©đ«, this maximization problem cannot be approximated in polynomial time within arbitrarily good precision. On the other hand, we present a simple greedy algorithm that delivers a solution with a value of at least 1/2 times the value of an optimal solution. Finally, we investigate the quality of an LPârelaxation of a formula…
Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Select...
137
16
2
1
Citation Types
0
88
0
0
Year Published
1999
2026
Publication Types
Select...
76
36
32
1
Relationship
1
144
Authors
Journals
Cited by 145 publications
(88 citation statements)
References 22 publications
0
88
0
0
“…JISP(k) is a well-studied problem in the Scheduling community, with several known complexity results. In particular, Spieksma [21] showed a 2-approximation for the problem, later improved to a 1.582-approximation by Chuzhoy et al [9]. This immediately implies a 1.582-approximation algorithm for MaxStarExp(k); we use the latter to conclude on the APX-completeness 6 of MaxStarExp(k).…”
Section: Maxstarexp(k)mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…JISP(k) is a well-studied problem in the Scheduling community, with several known complexity results. In particular, Spieksma [21] showed a 2-approximation for the problem, later improved to a 1.582-approximation by Chuzhoy et al [9]. This immediately implies a 1.582-approximation algorithm for MaxStarExp(k); we use the latter to conclude on the APX-completeness 6 of MaxStarExp(k).…”
Section: Maxstarexp(k)mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…We complement known polynomial-time approximability results (Spieksma 1999;Chuzhoy et al 2006) for Job Interval Selection with parameterized complexity results and extend the tractability results by HalldĂłrsson and Karlsson (2006) in several ways:…”
Section: Our Resultsmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Job Interval Selection was introduced by Nakajima and Hakimi (1982) and was shown APX-hard by Spieksma (1999), who also provided a ratio-2 greedy approximation algorithm. Chuzhoy et al (2006) improved this to a ratio-1.582 approximation algorithm.…”
Section: Known Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Results for Job Interval Selection. We complement known polynomialtime approximability results (Spieksma, 1999;Chuzhoy et al, 2006) for Job Interval Selection with parameterized complexity results and extend the tractability results by HalldĂłrsson and Karlsson (2006) in several ways:…”
Section: Our Resultsmentioning
confidence: 92%
