2007 41st Annual IEEE International Carnahan Conference on Security Technology 2007
DOI: 10.1109/ccst.2007.4373463
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On-Line Signature Verification by Dynamic Time Warping and Gaussian Mixture Models

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is clear from the results that our proposed system performs better even if training is done by using only 3 and 5 genuine signatures. The results on the MCYT database is also satisfactory where we have achieved the EER of .0020 when only 3 genuine signatures were used for training and EER of .0008 when only 5 genuine signatures were used, where as average EER in [13] and [9] is 0.0120, 0.0375 with 5 training signatures respectively. …”
Section: Experimental Results and Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…It is clear from the results that our proposed system performs better even if training is done by using only 3 and 5 genuine signatures. The results on the MCYT database is also satisfactory where we have achieved the EER of .0020 when only 3 genuine signatures were used for training and EER of .0008 when only 5 genuine signatures were used, where as average EER in [13] and [9] is 0.0120, 0.0375 with 5 training signatures respectively. …”
Section: Experimental Results and Conclusionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…DTW based approach by Kholmatov is ranked¯rst for skilled forgeries. The work done by Oscar 23 8 The singular points are used to determine the parameters of the zero-pole model in an o²ine scenario. Our work also uses global information such as acceleration vector in an online scenario.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The offered way does not deny the existing verification methods (Kamel, et al, 2008), (Impedovo, & Pirlo, 2008), (Fabregas, Faundez-Zanuy, 2009), (Miguel-Hurtado, et al, 2007), it is an additional alternative when determining the results of the signature recognition.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…9, No. 1;2015 We shall find the value of threshold for decision-making proceeding from the balance between sensitivity and specificity. According to the chosen value of threshold magnitudes of errors of first and second kind are defined for the signature verification.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%