Ieee Infocom 2009 2009
DOI: 10.1109/infcom.2009.5061984
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Efficient Content Matching in Distributed Pub/Sub Systems

Abstract: Abstract-The efficiency of matching structures is the key issue for content publish/subscribe systems. In this paper, we propose an efficient matching tree structure, named COBASTREE, for a distributed environment. Particularly, we model a predicate in each subscription filter as an interval and published content value as a data point. The COBASTREE is designed to index all subscription intervals and a matching algorithm is proposed to match the data points to these indexed intervals. Through a set of techniqu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
(26 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this part, we would like to compare the system with our algorithms with the system with another algorithm. Among all the current researches on topology in Pub/Sub system, some are about Pub/Sub routing [17][18][19][20] and some are about content-based matching [21][22][23]. We choose one algorithm in [17] called dynamic publication routing (we call it DPR for short) which is also suitable for cyclic or acyclic topology.…”
Section: Comparison To the System With Algorithm Dprmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this part, we would like to compare the system with our algorithms with the system with another algorithm. Among all the current researches on topology in Pub/Sub system, some are about Pub/Sub routing [17][18][19][20] and some are about content-based matching [21][22][23]. We choose one algorithm in [17] called dynamic publication routing (we call it DPR for short) which is also suitable for cyclic or acyclic topology.…”
Section: Comparison To the System With Algorithm Dprmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, Pub/Sub differs from this work as follows. First, the content-based pub/sub builds an indexing structure of either a full-dimensional index to cover all attributes or an index per attribute [31]. Given our problem with millions of query terms and document terms, the techniques used by the content-based pub/sub to build the traditional index (either a full-dimensional index to cover all attributes or an index per attribute) is inefficient due to the well known curse of dimensionality issue.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In terms of distributed content-based pub/sub (they adopt the similar filtering model as [11]), Cobas [31], Meghdoot [16] and Siena [9] are typical examples of distributed content-based pub/sub systems. Meghdoot [16] utilizes the favorable properties (e.g., scalability, fault tolerance, etc.)…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A number of subscription semantics and matching schemes have been considered for the publish/subscribe paradigm in the literature. Of those, content-based pub/sub [3,6,7,15], is deemed to provide the most flexible filtering model. It is also possible to implement contentbased pub/sub on top of a DHT [2,9].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%