“…Further, in describing fluid flow through both homogeneous and heterogeneous reservoirs, the geological formation of interest is assumed to be characterized by single-phase single-layered primary porosity, while in reality, it will also be characterized by a multi-phase multi-layered multiple-porosity systems. On top of it, for most of the applications, it is required to have the details at the microscopic scale, however, conceptually and mathematically simple macroscopic Darcy's law is widely used [Bradford and Leij, 1997;Diaz et al, 1987;Gray and Neill, 1976;Gray and Hassanizadeh, 1989;Hassanizadeh and Gray, 1990;Jerald and Salter, 1990;Kalaydjin, 1990;Liu et al, 2007;Muccino et al, 1998;Siddiqui et al, 2015;Teng and Zhao, 2000;Whitakar, 1986].Thus, there is a need to understand the fundamental concepts of the subsurface fluid flow at a scale lesser than Darcy's scale.For example, both groundwater and crude oil being the subsurface fluid flow, a litre of spilled crude oil in the subsurface environment can contaminate as much as one hundred thousand litres of groundwater; in addition, remediation of either onshore oil spill (contamination of groundwater by spilled crude oil) is not so easy as it will take several decades to address the same; and such field investigations require an understanding at the micro-or pore-scale processes and Darcy's law can only help us to address immediate concerns at a larger field scale; and any incorrect understanding of subsurface fluid flow processes will only land up with a marginal improvement in (enhanced) oil recovery factor. Since there is no mathematical model that can describe fluid flow through a porous medium at the microscopic-scale as on date, and since macroscopic Darcy's law is widely used till date by the oil and gas industries, it is necessary to understand the actual limitations associated with Darcy's law, when it is extended for various practical applications.…”