2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.buildenv.2010.02.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On CFD simulation of wind-induced airflow in narrow ventilated facade cavities: Coupled and decoupled simulations and modelling limitations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These numerical models allow selecting specific meteorological conditions to verify the air flow pattern behind cladding systems. For example, while Labat et al [15] focuses on solar driven air flow behind open joint claddings, Nore et al [13] studied the impact of wind-driven cavity ventilation behind sidings. A second group consists of methods in which the cavity flow conditions are modelled by hydraulic networks [e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These numerical models allow selecting specific meteorological conditions to verify the air flow pattern behind cladding systems. For example, while Labat et al [15] focuses on solar driven air flow behind open joint claddings, Nore et al [13] studied the impact of wind-driven cavity ventilation behind sidings. A second group consists of methods in which the cavity flow conditions are modelled by hydraulic networks [e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A) Comparison of the calculated ventilation rates based on Eq (13). and based on the indirect method for the first week of February 2014 B) comparison between measured vapour pressure in the air cavity (red), outside vapour pressure (green), simulated vapour pressure based with measured ventilation rate (blue) and constant ventilation rates (grey) (10-min data).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The coupled approach is difficult to employ when the differences in length scale are substantial or when flow behavior problems exist (Nore et al 2010). The decoupled approach is simplified compared to the coupled approach, but it is only efficient for certain phenomena.…”
Section: Decoupled Outdoor Wind and Indoor Infiltrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, CFD calculations provide data about complete flow area, i.e. the significant parameters in entire computational domain [3,[14][15][16][17][18]. An important advantage of numerical calculations is that it can be carried at the real scale (opposite are wind-tunnel experiments).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%