2010
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-642-16023-3_10
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On Byzantine Containment Properties of the min + 1 Protocol

Abstract: Self-stabilization is a versatile approach to fault-tolerance since it permits a distributed system to recover from any transient fault that arbitrarily corrupts the contents of all memories in the system. Byzantine tolerance is an attractive feature of distributed systems that permits to cope with arbitrary malicious behaviors.We consider the well known problem of constructing a breadth-first spanning tree in this context. Combining these two properties proves difficult: we demonstrate that it is impossible t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is useful for problems where information from remote nodes is unimportant (such as vertex coloring, link coloring, or dining philosophers). Timelocal algorithms [12], [13], [14], [15], [23] try to limit over time the effect of Byzantine faults. Time-local algorithms presented so far can tolerate the presence of at most a single Byzantine node, and are unable to mask the effect of Byzantine actions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is useful for problems where information from remote nodes is unimportant (such as vertex coloring, link coloring, or dining philosophers). Timelocal algorithms [12], [13], [14], [15], [23] try to limit over time the effect of Byzantine faults. Time-local algorithms presented so far can tolerate the presence of at most a single Byzantine node, and are unable to mask the effect of Byzantine actions.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A notable class of algorithms tolerates Byzantine failures with either space [17], [22], [25] or time [6], [7], [8], [9], [16] locality. Space local algorithms try to contain the fault as close to its source as possible.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Now, if we focus on topology-aware strong stabilization, [6] introduced the following containment area: [11] is a (t, S * B , n − 1)-TA strongly stabilizing protocol for maximum metric spanning tree construction with respect to BFS where t is a finite integer.…”
Section: Theorem 5 ([6])mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we generalize the set S * B previously defined for the BFS metric in [6] to any maximizable metric M = (M, W, mr, met, ≺).…”
Section: Topology Aware Strong Stabilizationmentioning
confidence: 99%