2009
DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.410-411.373
View full text | Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Abstract: The numerical simulation of the Single Point Incremental Forming process (SPIF) is time consuming due to the necessity to take into account various non-linearity such as the material behaviour, large strain deformation and the evolution of the tool-flange contact. Classical contact algorithms give good agreement with experimental results, but are time consuming. In this paper, we investigate the development of a procedure to simplify the management of the contact interface between the tool and the sheet. Nodes… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This algorithm was tested through the commercial code Abaqus and satisfactory results have been obtained by Robert et al [28]. The goal is to simplify the management of the contact between the tool and the sheet which leads to a reduction of the CPU time.…”
Section: Contact Assumption and Tool Path Control Parametermentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This algorithm was tested through the commercial code Abaqus and satisfactory results have been obtained by Robert et al [28]. The goal is to simplify the management of the contact between the tool and the sheet which leads to a reduction of the CPU time.…”
Section: Contact Assumption and Tool Path Control Parametermentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Because the majority of deformation in SPIF occurs in a small region around the tool, it is useful to understand the size and shape of this contact area. Contact geometry is useful for modelling aspects such as contact force distributions, 2 material distribution and failure prediction 3 and tribological conditions. While the actual area of contact is not directly needed for these purposes, it is nonetheless useful to have an understanding of the geometry of the contact patch and the influence from parameters such as tool diameter, stepdown and wall angle.…”
Section: In 2005mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They reported a shortening of CPU time while still maintaining a sufficient level of accuracy. Later, Robert et al [ 26 ] developed a simplified model for the forming tool/blank contact conditions incorporated into the ABAQUS software. The new algorithm enabled shortening of the computational time by 65% compared to a standard contact algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%