2014
DOI: 10.1007/s12206-014-0109-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

On a combination of ground-hook controllers for semi-active tuned mass dampers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the case of semi-active control, the displacement based groundhook algorithm that belongs to the category of direct output feedback controllers (i.e., the control actions are calculated based on a limited number of measurements) is selected. The choice of this direct output feedback controller for the case of semi-active control is based on the reduction of the computational effort required for the online calculation of Equations (7) and (8), requirement of minimum state measurements as well as its enhanced performance over other conventional direct output feedback controllers as shown in the studies of [21,27]. The mathematical expressions describing the control algorithm used in the derivation of the control actions are found in [28,29].…”
Section: Control Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the case of semi-active control, the displacement based groundhook algorithm that belongs to the category of direct output feedback controllers (i.e., the control actions are calculated based on a limited number of measurements) is selected. The choice of this direct output feedback controller for the case of semi-active control is based on the reduction of the computational effort required for the online calculation of Equations (7) and (8), requirement of minimum state measurements as well as its enhanced performance over other conventional direct output feedback controllers as shown in the studies of [21,27]. The mathematical expressions describing the control algorithm used in the derivation of the control actions are found in [28,29].…”
Section: Control Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The VB‐GH control policy has the largest impact compared with the other approaches in the higher frequency region (0.24‐0.28 Hz). In contrast to the VB‐GH approach, the power density of the tower top motion can be reduced significantly through the IVB‐GH approach in the low frequency region (0.2‐0.24 Hz) . Because the dominant loading caused by waves is mostly distributed in the low frequency range, the IVB‐GH control algorithm is expected to be the most promising method compared with other GH approaches when wave loading is the major contributor to the tower response, such as an extreme sea state.…”
Section: Structural Control Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the control algorithm also plays an important role in obtaining a good suspension performance. 10 For the SAS systems, numerous control schemes have been developed, such as sky-hook, 11 ground-hook, 12 proportional–integral–derivative (PID). 13 Also, some artificial algorithms such as fuzzy logic, 14 neural network 15 and model predictive control 4 have been also proved to be effective as the control strategies of the suspension system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%