Omni-channel service failures and recoveries: refined typologies using Facebook complaints

Abstract

Purpose This paper aims to present two updated typologies of service failures and recoveries in the omni-channel context. These typologies are based on customer complaints and recoveries collected from the corporate Facebook pages of four omni-channel department stores, two operating in Australia and two in the UK. Design/methodology/approach A document review is used of 400 customer complaints and recoveries. Content analysis is used to condense the Facebook data into categories of failures and recoveries. Findings Customer complaints on Facebook were triggered by a multitude of varying failures in the omni-channel context, given that it is the service brand that customers are experiencing, not just retail channels. The most prevalent failures were “bricks and mortar” shopping, delivery, marketing activities including communications and pricing, quality of goods and customer service. For service recoveries on Facebook, the four-dimensional justice framework appears valid. Research limitations/implications Study limitations include potentially missing details about the nature of the service failures and recoveries, including customer satisfaction with service recovery. Practical implications The typologies offer guidance to omni-channel retailers by showing the range of online and offline situations, including those unrelated to actual transactions that trigger customer complaints on Facebook and the tactics of recovering. Originality/value The authors contribute to the service domain by updating failure and recovery typologies to reflect the emerging omni-channel context, jointly exploring failures and recoveries on Facebook and applying a four-dimensional justice framework for recoveries on Facebook.

Unravelling Consumer Responses to Omni-Channel Approach

“…Attractive visual merchandising also motivates consumers to stay more time and stimulate purchase [28]. Although the OC evolution is changing consumers' shopping experience, many retailers still fail to deliver a flawless emotional experience [33]. As a result, despite the previous research results, the study on the effect of OC on consumer satisfaction remains to be clarified, and additional research is needed.…”

Social and technical chains-of-effects in business-to-business (B2B) service relationships

“…This more holistic picture is important since the literature is abundant with examples of how an integrated approach across channel modes has not performed as expected but interestingly only in relation to how selected aspects of how offline and online platforms are intertwined (e.g., Beck and Rygl, 2015;Ostrom et al, 2015;Rosenmayer et al, 2018;Xiao et al, 2019). Typically, Xiao et al (2019) note more consumers complain about online-tooffline activities (i.e., the use of online platforms to drive in-store sales) than any other area of e-business (p. 214), which is limited in scope but does indicate these two platforms are not fully synchronized in helping to deliver the overall customer experience.…”

Development and validation of the pick-up service quality scale of the buy-online-pick-up-in-store service

“…In practice, BOPS problems arise mostly in the offline pick-up process. Rosenmayer et al ( 2018 )‘s analysis of customer feedback showed that “bricks-and-mortar” shopping problems are most prevalent (24%) among omnichannel service failures, whereas “website design” issues account for only a small proportion (8%). Customers can experience various service problems in the offline channel, where they physically and more intimately interact with the retailer.…”