2014 IEEE Antennas and Propagation Society International Symposium (APSURSI) 2014
DOI: 10.1109/aps.2014.6904733
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Omega-shaped resonant elements for dual-polarization and wideband reflectarray

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In [11], ±5°rotation of elements improves the cross polarisation level to <−35 dB (in simulation) while the present work achieves lower cross-polarisation level in principal and non-principal planes (in simulation). In addition, the present work has better cross-polarisation compared with dual polarised single layer RA proposed in [12] and its modified version introduced in [13]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In [11], ±5°rotation of elements improves the cross polarisation level to <−35 dB (in simulation) while the present work achieves lower cross-polarisation level in principal and non-principal planes (in simulation). In addition, the present work has better cross-polarisation compared with dual polarised single layer RA proposed in [12] and its modified version introduced in [13]. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…1(c). Figure 2 shows geometries of the element's shape developed by the authors for dual-polarization and wide-band reflectarray [13][14][15]. To realize the dual-polarization use, the additional two resonant elements are put at the perpendicular as shown in Fig.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, it is necessary to suppress cross polarization, while keeping wide-band co-polarization properties. Therefore, this paper presents new reflectarray elements to suppress cross polarization [15]. These elements have linear phase lines and the desirable reflection-phase range of 360 • for the frequency response.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, there is a major drawback that the reflectarray is usable only in narrow bandwidth because the reflection phase of each element greatly depends on the frequency. To improve the reflectarray performances, a lot of investigations have been so far reported in [5]- [10], and also have reported in [11]- [13] such as dipole type ; convex-shaped elements [14], Ω-shaped elements [15], and four axial symmetric elements [16]. Furthermore, GA-optimized conductor elements have been reported in [17]- [20] to realize better performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%