2018
DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.1052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Olaparib versus chemotherapy treatment of physician’s choice in patients with a germline BRCA mutation and HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (OlympiAD): Efficacy in patients with visceral metastases.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…ORR in the olaparib arm was more than double the rate observed with TPC when assessed by blinded independent central review (59.9% vs. 28.8%) [29], and also when investigator-assessed (57.6% vs. 22.2%) [32]. Similarly, ORR with olaparib was more than double that with TPC in patients with visceral metastases (lung/pleura, liver, and brain/central nervous system) in post hoc analyses [74].…”
Section: Olaparib In the Phase 3 Olympiad Trialmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…ORR in the olaparib arm was more than double the rate observed with TPC when assessed by blinded independent central review (59.9% vs. 28.8%) [29], and also when investigator-assessed (57.6% vs. 22.2%) [32]. Similarly, ORR with olaparib was more than double that with TPC in patients with visceral metastases (lung/pleura, liver, and brain/central nervous system) in post hoc analyses [74].…”
Section: Olaparib In the Phase 3 Olympiad Trialmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…PFS HRs were consistent across a range of patient subgroups, including those with and those without prior exposure to chemotherapy for metastatic BC and in patients with TNBC, an important consideration given the limited treatment options available for TNBC [29]. Post hoc analyses suggested that patients with visceral metastases benefit from improvements in PFS, when investigated by location (lung/pleura, liver, and brain/central nervous system) [74]. Another post hoc analysis showed that, in the few patients whose tumors did not show loss of heterozygosity (6% of 125 tested patients), there was no evidence for a reduction in the efficacy of olaparib, based on PFS [30].…”
Section: Olaparib In the Phase 3 Olympiad Trialmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Outside of ovarian cancer, olaparib and talazoparib were approved by the FDA to treat gBRCAm, HER2-negative, locally advanced, or metastatic breast cancer patients who have received treatment with an anthracycline and/or a taxane (unless contraindicated) in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant, and/or metastatic treatment setting. Both approvals were based on significant improvement of PFS when compared to physician’s choice of chemotherapy in the randomized OlympiAD (NCT02000622) and EMBRACA (NCT01945775) trials [18,19].…”
Section: Current Food and Drug Administration-approved Parp Inhibimentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PFS benefit was consistent, regardless of prior platinum therapy or baseline BRCA1/2 mutations but was more evident among TNBC versus HR+/HER2− mBC patients (10). Furthermore, in comparison with the standard therapy, olaparib showed PFS benefits in patients with liver metastases and central nervous system (CNS) metastases (11).…”
Section: Study Resultsmentioning
confidence: 86%