1996
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd000092
|Get access via publisher |Summarize |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts

Oil-soluble versus water-soluble media for assessing tubal patency with hysterosalpingography or laparoscopy in subfertile women

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
15
2
1
0

Citation Types

0
4
0
0

Year Published

Range
1999
1999
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
14
4

Relationship

2
16

Authors

Journals

citations

Cited by 18 publications

(4 citation statements)
references

References 26 publications

0
4
0
0
Order By: Relevance
How this paper cites the one you are viewing
“…1,16 Vanderckhove and associates (2001) observed that the natural conception rate following hysterosalpingography is higher than the spontaneous cure rate of infertility. 17 However, in this case, use of hysterosalpingography investigation to increase the chances of fertility is on the lower side because conception through the right tube may not be possible, either due to tubal distal blockage resulting from peritubal adhesions that prevents the ovum pick up function at the time of ovulation or by creating a mechanical barrier affecting the fertilization. 1,18 The treatment for peritubal adhesions is surgical (i.e., adhesiolysis); however, this patient had no history of adhesiolysis.…”
Section: Discussion
mentioning
confidence: 98%