Abstract:The proband in this family has translocation Down's Syndrome 46, XX, t(14;21)(pll;qll), and this translocation was present in other family members. Sex chromosome mosaicism was demonstrated in three generations of the family, providing another example of familial mosaicism. There was also excessive foetal wastage in different family members. It was not possible to assign one common aetiological factor to account for these various abnormalities. Dermatoglyphic studies showed dominant inheritance of finger‐tip a… Show more
“…Concerning the present cases, perhaps the presence of sex chromosome mosaicism in the mother predisposes to the structural rearrangement in the germ cells, and to a later postzygotic non-disjunction (Smith & Elliot 1980, Jackson et al 1975). Alternately, a random association of two different sex chromosome mosaicisms in the same family could occur.…”
Two fertile women, mother and daughter, both presenting sex chromosomal mosaicism (45, X/46, XX/47, XXX and 45, X/46, Xr(X)) are reported. The mechanisms through which a Turner woman can eventually be fertile are discussed.
“…Concerning the present cases, perhaps the presence of sex chromosome mosaicism in the mother predisposes to the structural rearrangement in the germ cells, and to a later postzygotic non-disjunction (Smith & Elliot 1980, Jackson et al 1975). Alternately, a random association of two different sex chromosome mosaicisms in the same family could occur.…”
Two fertile women, mother and daughter, both presenting sex chromosomal mosaicism (45, X/46, XX/47, XXX and 45, X/46, Xr(X)) are reported. The mechanisms through which a Turner woman can eventually be fertile are discussed.
“…", we gave a negative answer in 1977 (Hecht & Patil). We now wish to reconsider this question in view of the paper by Smith & Elliott (1980) on the occurrence of sex chromosome mosaicism and a t(14q21q) translocation segregating in the same family, since the authors suggest that an interchromo-soma1 effect "would provide a common basis for the various abnormalities detected" in the family.…”
Section: Sirsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The report by Smith & Elliott (1980), together with a review of the literature, bears on several points: (1) Translocation t(14q21q): This is the commonest Dq2lq translocation causing Down syndrome (Hecht et al 1968 and1971). Smith & Elliott (1980) provide additional data indicating that the large majority of children born of parents carrying this translocation are phenotypically normal.…”
Section: Sirsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2) Familial chromosome mosaicism: At least 23 families with familial chromosome mosaicism have been reported (reviewed by Hsu et al (1970) and Smith & Elliott (1980)). There is now no doubt that familial chromosome mosaicism occurs.…”
Section: Sirsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(4) Segregation of t(14q21q) and familial (SCM): The autosomal translocation t(14q 21q) and familial SCM are segregating independently in the family described by Smith & Elliott (1980). Independent segregation is especially evident in the collateral branch of the family in which there is SCM without the translocation.…”
Karyotyped specimens of peripheral blood from 1,055 chromosomally normal individuals (573 females, 482 males) presenting with habitual spontaneous abortion were examined for aneuploidy. Trisomy 21 was noted in six of 14,802 cells. These data were not significantly different from those obtained on chromosomes 19 and 20, or the data obtained from three different, smaller, control groups. The low rate of trisomy 21 cells found in this study suggests that we cannot extrapolate from events in somatic cells in mitosis to nondisjunction events in meiosis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations –citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.