2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40279-020-01312-w
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occupational Physical Activity and Lung Cancer Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results from our study suggest that the ‘physical activity paradox’ applies even to associations between cardiovascular work intensity and musculoskeletal pain, complementing previous studies of cardiovascular health [ 2 , 3 , 4 ], cancer [ 5 ], and all-cause mortality [ 6 ]. Even though participants spent similar amounts of time in physical activity at work and during leisure (cf.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The results from our study suggest that the ‘physical activity paradox’ applies even to associations between cardiovascular work intensity and musculoskeletal pain, complementing previous studies of cardiovascular health [ 2 , 3 , 4 ], cancer [ 5 ], and all-cause mortality [ 6 ]. Even though participants spent similar amounts of time in physical activity at work and during leisure (cf.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
“…While it has consistently been shown that regularly engaging in high-intensity leisure-time physical activity (LTPA) is associated with positive health effects, occupational physical activity (OPA) with high intensity is associated with no beneficial, or even negative, health effects. This phenomenon, which is referred to as the ‘physical activity paradox’ [ 1 ], has been shown for various health outcomes such as cardiovascular health [ 2 , 3 , 4 ], some cancers [ 3 , 5 ], sleep quality [ 3 ], and all-cause mortality [ 6 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The increased risk of all-cause mortality may potentially be caused by other agents and diseases that may co-occur with high levels of occupational physical activity, such as exposure to occupational carcinogens or radiation. A recent review reported a 15% increased risk of lung cancer in men with high occupational physical activity after adjustment for age and smoking ( 61 ). Exposure to various air pollutants at work may increase both cardiovascular, all-cause and cancer mortality among industrial workers with high occupational physical activity levels from low-income blue-collar communities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-reported sociodemographic characteristics included sex, race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black, Hispanic, and other), educational attainment (less than high school, high school, and above high school), and family income (ratio of family income to the federal poverty level: <1.30, 1.30-3.49, or ≥3.5). 20 Lifestyle factors included leisure-time physical activity (inactive vs active, defined as engaging in no or any moderate to vigorous physical activities during the past 30 days at leisure-time), body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared: underweight, <18.5; normal weight, 18.5-24.9; overweight, 25.0-29.9; and obese ≥30.0), smoking status (never, former <20 pack-years, former ≥20 pack-years, former with unknown packyear, current <20 pack-years, and current ≥20 pack-years), alcohol consumption (derived from 24-hour dietary recall interviews: 0, 0.1-4.9, 5.0-14.9, 15.0-29.9, and ≥30.0 g/d), and the Healthy Eating Index-2010 (derived from 24-hour dietary recall interviews). The Healthy Eating Index-2010 indicates the overall dietary quality with a score ranging from 0 (worstquality diet) to 100 (best-quality diet).…”
Section: Key Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 History of chronic diseases (heart disease, stroke, cancer, and diabetes) was determined by participants receiving these diagnoses from health professionals or if participants were instructed to take prescribed medications for these conditions. 20…”
Section: Key Pointsmentioning
confidence: 99%