2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2016.08.025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occlusive drainage system for split-thickness skin graft: A prospective randomized controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although a more recent RCT by Hsiao et al with a total of 28 patients (14 in each group) was unable to show a significant difference in graft take, the patients suffered significantly less pain (on average up to 4 points on the visual analogue scale) under NPWT [8]. The patients were also significantly more satisfied with the treatment and outcome compared to the standard dressing.…”
Section: Controlled Randomized Studiesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Although a more recent RCT by Hsiao et al with a total of 28 patients (14 in each group) was unable to show a significant difference in graft take, the patients suffered significantly less pain (on average up to 4 points on the visual analogue scale) under NPWT [8]. The patients were also significantly more satisfied with the treatment and outcome compared to the standard dressing.…”
Section: Controlled Randomized Studiesmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…There are some negatives to NPWT that compression may mitigate. One example is that compression with an occlusive dressing can be more tolerated by patients compared to a high-pressure vacuum (18). The simplicity of compression could also mitigate the pain associated with frequent dressing or vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) machine changes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 100% of negative pressure dressing group rated the procedure as comfortable, convenient and recommendable as opposed to the petroleum gauze group where only 16.7% rated it as both comfortable and recommendable, 0% rated it as convenient. They also observed less pain in the negative pressure group compared to the conventional dressing group [ 14 ]. Pyo et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%