2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.0909-752x.2001.10311.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Occlusion vs. skin barrier function

Abstract: Background/aims: Skin occlusion may increase percutaneous absorption of applied chemicals, with some exceptions. It also obstructs the normal ventilation of the skin surface and increases stratum corneum hydration and hence compromises skin barrier function. Methods/results: This review focuses the effects of occlusion on skin barrier function, in particularly, as defined with objective skin bioengineering technology. Conclusions: The effects of occlusion on skin barrier function have been defined with various… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
98
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 168 publications
(102 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
98
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…26 The combination of CHG and dressing over time (between dressing changes) may behave as a film with relatively 'low water vapor permeability' to block water loss and allow water accumulation at the skin surface below the dressing. 27 The type of adhesive in the dressing may negatively affect permeability, that is, reduce the rate of moisture loss from the skin. 28 Occlusive films significantly delayed SC barrier repair following tape stripping relative to semipermeable dressings and no occlusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 The combination of CHG and dressing over time (between dressing changes) may behave as a film with relatively 'low water vapor permeability' to block water loss and allow water accumulation at the skin surface below the dressing. 27 The type of adhesive in the dressing may negatively affect permeability, that is, reduce the rate of moisture loss from the skin. 28 Occlusive films significantly delayed SC barrier repair following tape stripping relative to semipermeable dressings and no occlusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application on the skin of any membrane that interferes with the normal TEWL, e.g. water-impermeable membranes, causes profound effects on the skin barrier such as increasing the percutaneous absorption of applied chemicals and the alteration of epidermal lipids, DNA synthesis, surface pH and bacterial flora [58][59][60]. Furthermore, the TEWL itself is a signal to the normalization of the stratum corneum barrier function [61].…”
Section: Wvtrmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was monitored hydration of the skin (EC), the most valid measurement for assessment of low irritant skin reactions (EI), as well as TEWL measurement, which is a highly sensitive and precise method for the determination of skin water loss (Table 1). It is known that occlusion itself could induce barrier damage and may cause irritation (Zhai and Maibach, 2002). In order to eliminate the influence of occlusion itself, final measurements of the monitored parameters were performed 2 h after occlusion removal, when the effects of occlusion have been finished.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%