2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.12.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Obstacle crossing in lower limb amputees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
57
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
2
57
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Use of a prosthesis may promote independence in activities that incorporate the lower limb (e.g., postural transitions, locomotion), but prominent deficits remain. Standing balance [12], level-ground walking [13][14][15][16][17][18], stair ascent and descent [19][20][21], hill ascent and descent [22], negotiation of uneven terrain [14], standing from and sitting in a chair [23], and obstacle avoidance [24] have been reported to be significantly impaired in persons with TFA compared to nondisabled control subjects. Documented limitations typically relate to the capacity of prosthetic users to engage in specified activities compared with those without amputation in controlled laboratory environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Use of a prosthesis may promote independence in activities that incorporate the lower limb (e.g., postural transitions, locomotion), but prominent deficits remain. Standing balance [12], level-ground walking [13][14][15][16][17][18], stair ascent and descent [19][20][21], hill ascent and descent [22], negotiation of uneven terrain [14], standing from and sitting in a chair [23], and obstacle avoidance [24] have been reported to be significantly impaired in persons with TFA compared to nondisabled control subjects. Documented limitations typically relate to the capacity of prosthetic users to engage in specified activities compared with those without amputation in controlled laboratory environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5, the hip was consistently more externally rotated throughout the entire gait cycle, indicating that as the subject swung the limb forward, the leg lagged behind in comparison to normal walking. This motion is similar to the hip circumduction strategy often seen in prosthesis users during obstacle clearance [12]. By rotating at the hip joint, this enabled the subject to achieve greater toe clearance even with less knee flexion as compared with normal walking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…The percentage agreement scores between the two reviewers were good (Cohen kappa: 0.67). Only four studies scored >50 percent in both external validity and internal validity sections [18,33,41,43]. None of the included studies reported power calculation and all scored poorly for this question.…”
Section: Outcome Variablesmentioning
confidence: 94%