2002
DOI: 10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01845-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observing the transformation of experience into memory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

48
646
5
3

Year Published

2003
2003
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 799 publications
(714 citation statements)
references
References 83 publications
48
646
5
3
Order By: Relevance
“…According to this hypothesis, participants should be more accurate in classifying images that are repeated from training, regardless of the presence of an object within the image. At the neural level, the learning of exemplars during training is dependent upon brain networks supporting the perception and encoding of stimuli (for a review see Paller & Wagner, 2002). The physiological effects of anodal tDCS are thought to include increased excitability in the neocortex (Liebetanz, Nitsche, Tergau, & Paulus, 2002), a theory that is supported by our recent findings of increased glutamatergic activity with anodal tDCS (Clark, Coffman, Trumbo, & Gasparovic, 2011); therefore, it is possible that the anodal tDCS delivered in these experiments enhanced activity in specific brain regions, namely the right inferior frontal cortex, which may have facilitated the cognitive functions that support perception and encoding, leading to greater accuracy in classifying images later during testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to this hypothesis, participants should be more accurate in classifying images that are repeated from training, regardless of the presence of an object within the image. At the neural level, the learning of exemplars during training is dependent upon brain networks supporting the perception and encoding of stimuli (for a review see Paller & Wagner, 2002). The physiological effects of anodal tDCS are thought to include increased excitability in the neocortex (Liebetanz, Nitsche, Tergau, & Paulus, 2002), a theory that is supported by our recent findings of increased glutamatergic activity with anodal tDCS (Clark, Coffman, Trumbo, & Gasparovic, 2011); therefore, it is possible that the anodal tDCS delivered in these experiments enhanced activity in specific brain regions, namely the right inferior frontal cortex, which may have facilitated the cognitive functions that support perception and encoding, leading to greater accuracy in classifying images later during testing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Available evidence from EEG and fMRI data suggest that successful encoding into LTM depends on close interactions between frontal and temporal regions. Stronger activation of these regions positively correlates with performance on a later memory test (see Paller and Wagner, 2002;Fell and Axmacher, 2011 for a review). Theta rhythm resulting from hippocampal-cortical interactions proved to be important for encoding episodic memories via long-term potentiation and depression (i.e.…”
Section: Functional Connections Of Fm Theta During Wm Maintenance Is mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We extended the analysis of maintenance processes and compared EEG characteristics of EEG epochs corresponding to successfully versus unsuccessfully maintained items which may reveal additional FC-s beyond those that are sensitive to increasing memory load. Differences in the strength of connectivity resulting from the comparison of the successfully versus unsuccessfully maintained items was thought to characterize the pattern of neuronal network during the time of retention, that may considered to be a predictive indicator of successful maintenance processes (Paller and Wagner, 2002). The comparison of low and high memory demanding trials aimed to reveal sustained functional network of FM theta related to the capacity of WM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such subsequent memory effects provide powerful evidence regarding the neural substrates of memory formation as they link neural responses during goal-directed stimulus processing with a behavioral measure of effective encoding (i.e. later remembering) [26,50]. Extant fMRI data, however, do not address whether the role of pLIPC and parietal computations in verbal encoding differs depending on whether pre-existing phonological representations are available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%