2016
DOI: 10.1002/2015jc010788
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observations and model simulations of wave‐current interaction on the inner shelf

Abstract: Wave directions and mean currents observed for two 1 month long periods in 7 and 2 m water depths along 11 km of the southern shoreline of Martha's Vineyard, MA, have strong tidal modulations. Wave directions are modulated by as much as 70° over a tidal cycle. The magnitude of the tidal modulations in the wavefield decreases alongshore to the west, consistent with the observed decrease in tidal currents from 2.1 to 0.2 m/s along the shoreline. A numerical model (SWAN and Deflt3D‐FLOW) simulating waves and curr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

2
24
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(91 reference statements)
2
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to previous studies at this location [Hopkins et al, 2015], for the no-wind cases and relatively short evolution distances here, wind and nonlinear interactions were not included.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationssupporting
confidence: 52%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Similar to previous studies at this location [Hopkins et al, 2015], for the no-wind cases and relatively short evolution distances here, wind and nonlinear interactions were not included.…”
Section: Numerical Simulationssupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The divergence (convergence) of the transport vectors was used as a proxy for erosion (deposition), and the morphology was not updated during the model run. These proxies primarily are a function of the simulated hydrodynamics, which have been verified with field observations at this [Hopkins et al, 2015] and other shallow-water locations. When initialized with frequency-directional spectra from WaveWatchIII [Tolman, 2002] …”
Section: Numerical Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…The wave model solves the spectral action balance and includes 53 the effects of shoaling, refraction, and wave-current interaction. Similar to previous studies at 54 this location [27], for the no-wind cases and relatively short evolution distances here, wind and 55 nonlinear interactions were not included. The circulation model includes the effects of waves on 56 currents through wave radiation-stress gradients, combined wave and current bed shear stress, [27].…”
supporting
confidence: 55%
“…Between 2011 and 2015, tidal currents observed in Katama Inlet were as high as 2 m/s (Orescanin et al, 2016) and tidal currents flowing through Muskeget Channel separating Vineyard Sound from the Atlantic (Figure 1) were as high as 3 m/s (Hopkins et al, 2017). Observations at this site were used in prior studies to calibrate and validate the numerical model Delft3D (Lesser et al, 2004) for waves and currents (Hopkins et al, 2016(Hopkins et al, , 2017. Here rapid morphological evolution and associated waves and currents observed at Katama are used to calibrate Delft3D for sediment transport.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The field observations are used to calibrate a numerical model that simulates nearshore hydrodynamics, sediment transport, and morphological change along the southern shoreline of Martha's Vineyard, MA ( Figure 1; Hopkins et al, 2016Hopkins et al, , 2017. Norton Point, the sand barrier separating Katama Bay from the Atlantic Ocean, breached during a nor'easter storm in April 2007 to form Katama Inlet (Figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%