2019
DOI: 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b05011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of High Spin-to-Charge Conversion by Sputtered Bismuth Selenide Thin Films at Room Temperature

Abstract: We investigated spin-to-charge conversion in sputtered Bi43Se57/Co20Fe60B20 heterostructures with in-plane magnetization at room temperature. High spin-to-charge conversion voltage signals have been observed at room temperature. The transmission electron microscope images show that the sputtered bismuth selenide thin films are nanogranular in structure. The spin-pumping voltage decreases with an increase in the size of the grains. The inverse Edelstein effect length (λIEE) is estimated to be as large as 0.32 n… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
43
1
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
12
43
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The two-magnon scattering (TMS) cannot be fully accounted for with the subtraction method, and it can generate an over-or under-estimation of g eff . [4,35] On the other hand, our extracted g eff value for both PRE ANN and POST ANN samples is g eff = 2.2 • 10 19 m 2 , being very well in accordance with those reported for similar heterostructures, [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] thus suggesting a negligible contribution of TMS at the Fe/Sb 2 Te 3 interfaces.…”
Section: Broadband Fmr Andsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The two-magnon scattering (TMS) cannot be fully accounted for with the subtraction method, and it can generate an over-or under-estimation of g eff . [4,35] On the other hand, our extracted g eff value for both PRE ANN and POST ANN samples is g eff = 2.2 • 10 19 m 2 , being very well in accordance with those reported for similar heterostructures, [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] thus suggesting a negligible contribution of TMS at the Fe/Sb 2 Te 3 interfaces.…”
Section: Broadband Fmr Andsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…For sample POST ANN-IL we obtain λ IEE = 0.27 nm, which is in perfect agreement with the value obtained in Au/Co/Au/Sb 2 Te 3 , [4] thus demonstrating the intrinsic role played by Sb 2 Te 3 and its preserved TSS to origin such a large S2C. When compared to other 2 nd class chalcogenide-based TI, [26,[37][38][39][48][49][50][51][52][53][54] the extracted λ IEE is comparable to the highest reported so far.…”
Section: Broadband Fmr Andsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…4(c) shows hyperbolic tangent behavior as a function of the film thickness. This dependence is quite different from that in FM/TI heterostructures as expected from the IREE [47,48] but tracks the behavior observed in heavy metals in accordance with the ISHE. This suggests that a significant amount of charge current is generated from the bulk of the alloy meaning that SOC is dominant in interconversion at room temperature, which has also been seen in other topological materials like Bi-Sb alloys [49] and WTe2 [50].…”
Section: (D) Also Shows a Useful Comparison Of Spin Hall Angles Betwesupporting
confidence: 54%
“…It is noteworthy that all of the obtained values are still 5–7 times larger than that of pristine 3D‐TI Bi 2 Se 3 (≈0.035 nm), [ 14 ] indicating the synergistic SCC efficiency from dual TSSs. Compared with the best reported Bi‐based quantum materials as summarized in Figure 2g: λ IEE = 0.05 nm in the isolated Bi layer, [ 26 ] 0.28 nm in Bi/Bi 2 Se 3 , [ 23 ] and 0.3 nm in the sputtered Bi 2 Se 3 materials, [ 27 ] the obtained large spin‐to‐charge conversion in the TSLs indicates the key role of the reduced dimensionality and coexisting TSSs, as revealed in the ARPES results, in determining the spin‐to‐charge conversion.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%