2016
DOI: 10.1186/s40623-016-0574-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Observation of earthquake ground motion due to aftershocks of the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake in damaged areas

Abstract: We have conducted observation of earthquake ground motion due to aftershocks of the 2016 Kumamoto earthquake at 26 temporary stations in damaged areas of Kumamoto city, Mashiki town, Nishihara village and Minami-Aso village (partly in Aso city) in Kumamoto prefecture, Japan. Continuous recordings of ground acceleration were acquired in a period of about 1 month after the occurrence of the main shock on April 16, 2016. This preliminary analysis of the observed records clearly indicates strong effects of local g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This may be because the stress shadow effect was slightly overestimated and the rupture delayed in the stress shadow zone. We did not focus on the reproduction of the observed seismograms in this study because we assumed uniform P-and S-wave velocities in the simulations, but this assumption was too simple to reproduce the near-fault site effect mentioned in the observations (Yamanaka et al 2016). In addition, the element size (0.5 km 2 ) might be too large to represent the surface movement by the fault.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be because the stress shadow effect was slightly overestimated and the rupture delayed in the stress shadow zone. We did not focus on the reproduction of the observed seismograms in this study because we assumed uniform P-and S-wave velocities in the simulations, but this assumption was too simple to reproduce the near-fault site effect mentioned in the observations (Yamanaka et al 2016). In addition, the element size (0.5 km 2 ) might be too large to represent the surface movement by the fault.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…b Black triangles show the locations of temporary observation sites deployed in Mashiki (S1-S8). Gray triangles indicate the temporary aftershock observation stations deployed by Yamanaka et al (2016) in the same area (MK01, MK02, MK05 and MK09) and a white triangle shows the location of seismic intensity meter deployed by JMA. Gray squares show the locations of the seismic intensity observation station inside Mashiki town office (MTO) and the KiK-net strong-motion observation station KMMH16 (same location as the Hi-net station N.MSIH) operated during both the largest foreshock and the mainshock.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1b). Figure 1b also shows the locations of aftershock observation stations deployed by Yamanaka et al (2016) (gray triangles: MK01, MK02, MK05 and MK09) and a seismic intensity station deployed by JMA (white triangle) just after the mainshock. Our aftershock observation sites were installed in the heavily damaged zones, while the existing temporary aftershock stations were located outside of this zone.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hata et al (2016) also try to reproduce strong ground motion, especially near the Shinkansen (bullet train system in Japan) track, with special reference to site effects. Yamanaka et al (2016) conduct dense observation of aftershocks in heavily damaged areas and find local amplification effects in Mashiki, Nishihara and Kumamoto, but not in Minami-Aso. Chimoto et al (2016) conduct array analysis in Mashiki and Nishihara and obtain the S-wave velocity structure, which they consider controls site amplification.…”
Section: Open Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%