2017
DOI: 10.1590/0034-7612145223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

O papel da burocracia de nível de rua na implementação e (re)formulação da Política Nacional de Humanização dos serviços de saúde de Porto Alegre (RS)

Abstract: This article analyzes the implementation of the National Humanization Policy in basic health units of Porto Alegre. For this, we analyzed interaction that emphasizes the process of mutual influence between the planning of public policy and characteristics of local implementation. Thus, this perspective is from the context of operations of street-level bureaucracies, emphasizing the role played by its discretion. The study was qualitative with the use of primary and secondary data. We examined implementers, giv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
6
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Although there are many differences regarding administrative cultures among developing countries (Kuhlmann, 2019), evidence indicates that frontline working conditions are generally characterized by more uncertainty and ambiguity because of the politicized nature of bureaucracy (Zarychta et al., 2020), the lack of job security (Cerna et al., 2017; Eiró, 2019; Lima & D'Ascenzi, 2017), the limited formalization of working procedures (Kelly, 2017; Lotta & Marques, 2020; Stanica et al., 2020), the lack of managerial guidance and training on the job (Ambort & Straschnoy, 2018; Eiró, 2019), and the scarcity of basic resources (Cerna et al., 2017; Gibson, 2004; Lima & D'Ascenzi, 2017; Walker & Gilson, 2004). Moreover, social inequality and poverty tend to make frontline decisions about providing vulnerable clients access to public benefits and benefits more demanding (Ambort & Straschnoy, 2018; Cerna et al., 2017; Eiró, 2019; Gibson, 2004; Kelly, 2017).…”
Section: Coping With Public Service Gaps In the Developing Worldmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although there are many differences regarding administrative cultures among developing countries (Kuhlmann, 2019), evidence indicates that frontline working conditions are generally characterized by more uncertainty and ambiguity because of the politicized nature of bureaucracy (Zarychta et al., 2020), the lack of job security (Cerna et al., 2017; Eiró, 2019; Lima & D'Ascenzi, 2017), the limited formalization of working procedures (Kelly, 2017; Lotta & Marques, 2020; Stanica et al., 2020), the lack of managerial guidance and training on the job (Ambort & Straschnoy, 2018; Eiró, 2019), and the scarcity of basic resources (Cerna et al., 2017; Gibson, 2004; Lima & D'Ascenzi, 2017; Walker & Gilson, 2004). Moreover, social inequality and poverty tend to make frontline decisions about providing vulnerable clients access to public benefits and benefits more demanding (Ambort & Straschnoy, 2018; Cerna et al., 2017; Eiró, 2019; Gibson, 2004; Kelly, 2017).…”
Section: Coping With Public Service Gaps In the Developing Worldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the literature on street‐level bureaucracy has traditionally drawn its main empirical findings from developed countries, such as the United States or Western Europe (Kelly, 2017; Stanica et al., 2020). More recently, there is a growing interest in studying frontline work in the developing world as well, including Latin America (Ambort & Strachnoy, 2018; Cerna et al., 2017; Eiró, 2019; Lima & D'Ascenzi, 2017; Lotta & Marques, 2020; Meza & Moreno‐Jaimes, 2020; Peeters et al., 2018; Perelmiter, 2016; Zarychta et al., 2020), Africa (Gibson, 2004; Kelly, 2017; Walker & Gilson, 2004), Asia (Khator et al., 1992; Nisar, 2018, 2020; Zang, 2017), and Eastern Europe (Stanica et al., 2020).…”
Section: Coping With Public Service Gaps In the Developing Worldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entendemos que essa especificidade é profícua pois esse tipo de política se caracteriza pela baixa diferenciação entre os processos de formulação e de implementação e pela alta descentralização deste último, no qual intervém uma pluralidade de atores. Assim, no contexto brasileiro, diferem das políticas cuja formulação é centralizada no governo federal e a implementação descentralizada aos municípios e suas burocracias, dinâmicas que têm sido analisadas à luz de perspectivas dos tipos bottom-up e top-down (LOTTA, 2012;PIRES, 2012;BICHIR, 2016;LIMA;D'ASCENZI, 2017). Dentro desse campo, alinhar-nos-emos às abordagens de governance que destacam o policentrismo, a pluralidade de atores e a variedade de mecanismos decisórios que formam os processos das políticas públicas (BEVIR, 2013;DENTERS, 2013;HILL;HUPE, 2014).…”
Section: Referencial Analíticounclassified
“…Outra parte concentra-se na burocracia que interage diretamente com o público beneficiário das políticas públicas, conhecidos como burocratas de nível de rua (Lotta 2010;A. Oliveira 2012;Rodrigues 2016;Lima & D'Ascenzi 2017). No Brasil e no mundo, são recentes os estudos sistemáticos sobre os burocratas que ocupam posição intermediária.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified