Nutrição e produtividade de plantas de pimentão colorido, adubadas com biofertilizante de suíno

Sediyama, Maria Aparecida Nogueira; Santos, Marlei Rosa dos; Vidigal, Sânzio Mollica; Pinto, Cláudia Lúcia de Oliveira; Jacob, Luciano Luís

doi:10.1590/s1415-43662014000600004

Cited by 39 publications

(36 citation statements)

References 14 publications

(17 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The foliar contents of N, P, K, Ca, Mg, S, Fe, Mn, Cu and Zn in soybeans were not affected (p > 0.05) by treatments (Table 3). Similar results were obtained by Santos et al (2012), Sediyama et al (2014), Seidel et al (2010) and Bócoli et al (2016), which detected no changes in foliar concentrations of N, P and K in squash, peppers and corn, respectively, with the application of pig manure. However, Corrêa et al (2008) noted that, with increasing doses of organic waste, N content increased in soybean leaves.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 87%

“…Various alternatives have been proposed for utilization of such waste in agriculture, and use as fertilizer in the soil, one of the most promising, since applied with discretion (Amorim et al, 2005;Sediyama et al, 2005;Corrêa et al, 2001;Santos et al, 2012;Lourenzi et al, 2014;Sediyama et al, 2014;Sousa et al, 2014). These technical criteria take into account the extraction of nutrients, nutritional requirement of the crop, soil fertility and waste analysis (Correa et al, 2011).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Long-term application of swine manure on soybean grown in no-till system in Savannah soils

Menezes¹,

Silva²,

Cantão³

et al. 2017

Afr. J. Agric. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The application of liquid swine manure (LSM) in the soil as biofertilizer is one of the most recycling alternatives adopted, because the nutrients contained in this residue can override, in part or totally, commercial fertilizers, crop productivity with a reduction in production costs. The goal with this work was to evaluate the use of LSM as a substitute of mineral fertilization on soybean culture in conditions of Savannah in 2014/2015. The experimental design was of randomized blocks with three replications. The treatments consisted of the use of mineral fertilizer recommended for soybean culture; without fertilization; and doses of LSM (25; 50; 75 and 100 m³ ha -1 ). The levels of N, P, K, Ca, Mg, Cu, Zn, Mn and Fe in leaves, seeds and dry matter from the shoot, plant height and productivity of grain was assessed. There was no statistical difference between treatments that received mineral fertilization (P and K) and the treatments that received pig manure, indicating that the use of pig waste as bio fertilizer on soybean fertilization may be a promising alternative. The mineral fertilizer in soybean culture can be replaced by shots of LSM from 80 m³ ha -1 with no losses in grain productivity in a clayey dystroferric Red Latosol. The applications of doses of pig manure generally did not promote increase in the content of nutrients in grains and in the extraction of nutrients by the aerial part of the soybeans plants.

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 87%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Long-term application of swine manure on soybean grown in no-till system in Savannah soils

Menezes¹,

Silva²,

Cantão³

et al. 2017

Afr. J. Agric. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…On the other hand, the interaction of 50% of cattle manure in the presence of the biofertilizer increased RDM, and may be associated with the provision of macro and micronutrients, apportionment of applications and its release during the crop cycle (Sediyama et al, 2014), or there could be a likely decomposition of organic matter by microorganisms present in the biofertilizer, releasing humic substances.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cattle manure and liquid biofertilizer for biomass production of yellow passion fruit seedlings

Andrade¹,

Alves²,

Araújo³

et al. 2017

Afr. J. Agric. Res.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aims to evaluate the production of biomass of different cattle manure, and biofertilizer concentrations. The experiment was conducted between April and June 2014 in a greenhouse at the seedling production nursery of the State University of Paraíba (UEPB), Catolé do Rocha, Paraíba (PB) state. The experiment was completely randomized in a 5 x 2 factorial design corresponding to five levels of cattle manure (0, 20, 40, 60 and 80% of the substrate volume) in the absence, and the presence of a biofertilizer. The propagation material was giant yellow passion fruits with 95 to 100% of purity purchased in the local market. After 60 days, the following variables were evaluated: root dry matter (RDM), plant dry matter (PDM), root biomass (RB), shoot biomass (SB), plant biomass (PB), biomass percentage (BP), effective leaf area (ELA) and leaf area ratio (LAR). The interaction between cattle manure and fertilizer concentrations was significant for root dry matter, mass of total plant dry matter, root biomass, shoot biomass and total plant biomass. In turn, cattle manure affected significantly biomass percentage, effective leaf area and leaf area ratio. Cattle manure and biofertilizer make the production of yellow passion fruit seedlings feasible.

show abstract

“…Essa divergência pode ser explicada, provavelmente, pela menor prolificidade do meloeiro em relação ao maxixeiro. Na literatura são raros os trabalhos sobre uso de biofertilizantes na cultura do maxixeiro, porém, podem ser encontrados diversos relatos com outras culturas como tomateiro (GOMES JÚNIOR et al, 2011), meloeiro , pimentão (SEDIYAMA et al, 2014), entre outras.…”

Section: Resultsunclassified

Produtividade de cultivares de maxixeiro em função de doses de biofertilizante

Gomes

Oliveira²,

Bezerra

et al. 2015

AGRO@MBIENTE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Resumo: Os frutos de maxixeiro são de grande apreciação na culinária brasileira, principalmente nas regiões Norte e Nordeste do Brasil. No entanto, é considerada uma cultura secundária e seu cultivo é realizado sem adoção de manejo tecnificado. Devido o seu cultivo ser realizado, principalmente, por pequenos produtores, as pesquisas empregando insumos produzidos na própria propriedade, como o biofertilizante, na adubação do maxixe são relevantes. Nesse sentido, objetivou-se com este trabalho avaliar o efeito de doses de biofertilizante na produtividade de duas cultivares de maxixe. Utilizou-se o delineamento inteiramente casualizado, em esquema fatorial 2 x 4, com quatro repetições. Os fatores consistiram de duas cultivares (Do Norte e Liso Gibão) e quatro doses de biofertilizante (0; 8; 16 e 24 m 3 ha -1 ), aplicadas via fertirrigação. O experimento foi conduzido durante 100 dias, sendo realizadas seis colheitas, nas quais se avaliou as seguintes variáveis: número de frutos, massa de frutos, produção e produtividade. Todas as variáveis foram afetadas pela interação entre os fatores estudados. As cultivares estudadas não diferiram quanto à produção, no entanto, a cv. Do Norte apresentou maior número de frutos, enquanto a cv. Liso Gibão apresentou frutos mais pesados. A partir dos resultados obtidos, recomenda-se a dose de 14 m 3 ha -1 para a cultivar Liso Gibão. Para a cultivar Do Norte, recomenda-se mais estudos com doses mais elevadas de biofertilizante. Palavras-chave:Cucumis anguria L. Fertilizante orgânico. Insumo orgânico. Abstract:The fruit of the West Indian gherkin is greatly appreciated in Brazilian cuisine, especially in the north and northeast of Brazil. However, it is still considered a secondary crop, and is cultivated using non-technical management. As it is a crop produced mainly by small farmers, any research should be directed towards its cultivation using inputs produced on the farm itself, such as bio-fertilisers. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect on the yield of two West Indian gherkin cultivars, of different doses of bio-fertiliser consisting of cattle manure and commercial products containing bacteria and enzymes that degrade organic molecules. A completely randomised design was used in a 2 x 4 factorial scheme with four replications. The factors included two cultivars (Do Norte and Liso Gibão) and four doses of bio-fertiliser (0, 8, 16 and 24 m 3 ha -1 ) applied through fertigation. The experiment lasted for 100 days, with six collections being made, for which the following variables were evaluated: number of fruits, fruit weight, production and yield. All the variables were affected by the interaction between the factors under study. The cultivars did not differ as to yield, however the De North cultivar gave the highest number of fruits, while the Liso Gibão cultivar produced fruit of a greater weight. From the results obtained, a dose of 14 m 3 ha -1 is recommended for the Liso Gibão cultivar. For the De Norte cultivar, further studies with higher doses of bio-fertilise...

show abstract

Nutrição e produtividade de plantas de pimentão colorido, adubadas com biofertilizante de suíno

Cited by 39 publications

References 14 publications

Long-term application of swine manure on soybean grown in no-till system in Savannah soils

Long-term application of swine manure on soybean grown in no-till system in Savannah soils

Cattle manure and liquid biofertilizer for biomass production of yellow passion fruit seedlings

Produtividade de cultivares de maxixeiro em função de doses de biofertilizante

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About