2016
DOI: 10.3847/0004-637x/825/2/132
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

NuSTAR HARD X-RAY SURVEY OF THE GALACTIC CENTER REGION. II. X-RAY POINT SOURCES

Abstract: We present the first survey results of hard X-ray point sources in the Galactic Center (GC) region by NuSTAR. We have discovered 70 hard (3-79 keV) X-ray point sources in a 0.6 deg 2 region around SgrA * with a total exposure of 1.7 Ms, and 7 sources in the SgrB2 field with 300 ks. We identify clear Chandra counterparts for 58 NuSTAR sources and assign candidate counterparts for the remaining 19. The NuSTAR survey reaches X-ray luminosities of ∼4× and ∼8×10 32 erg s -1 at the GC (8 kpc) in the 3-10 and 10-… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
73
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
4
73
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, the large post-collapse visual extinction used in the models (as indeed confirmed by the observational H 2 column density of around 5 × 10 24 cm −2 ) is likely to lead to some further attenuation of the CR field. Other sources of ionization affecting the chemistry in the hot core are unlikely; for example, there is no evidence for an embedded X-ray source in Sgr B2(N) (Hong et al 2016). While an embedded UCHII region does exist within Sgr B2(N2) (De Pree et al 2015), with an angular size of ∼0.12", the gas probed by our EMoCA observations has a scale size of 1"; a rudimentary calculation would indicate an intervening visual extinction on the order of at least several thousand magnitudes, far beyond any value at which the UV field associated with the UCHII region might conceivably affect the chemistry traced by our EMoCA observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the large post-collapse visual extinction used in the models (as indeed confirmed by the observational H 2 column density of around 5 × 10 24 cm −2 ) is likely to lead to some further attenuation of the CR field. Other sources of ionization affecting the chemistry in the hot core are unlikely; for example, there is no evidence for an embedded X-ray source in Sgr B2(N) (Hong et al 2016). While an embedded UCHII region does exist within Sgr B2(N2) (De Pree et al 2015), with an angular size of ∼0.12", the gas probed by our EMoCA observations has a scale size of 1"; a rudimentary calculation would indicate an intervening visual extinction on the order of at least several thousand magnitudes, far beyond any value at which the UV field associated with the UCHII region might conceivably affect the chemistry traced by our EMoCA observations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We exclude from the survey NuSTAR fields with bright science targets, identified as fields with > 10 6 counts within 120 of the on-axis position. We also exclude the dedicated extragalactic (COSMOS, ECDFS, EGS, GOODS-N, UDS) and Galactic survey fields (the Galactic center survey; Mori et al 2015;Hong et al 2016; and the Norma Arm survey; Fornasini et al, in prep. ).…”
Section: The Serendipitous Survey Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10, they were identified as originating from the binary 1A 1743-294 in an outburst during the observations. 12 …”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fig. 10 During a Galactic Plane survey, 12 the streak appeared at two different locations, and, by generating the sky mosaic and tracing back the streaks, it was discovered that they came from 1A 1742-294, an x-ray binary that was in outburst.…”
Section: Back Reflectionsmentioning
confidence: 99%