2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.03.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Nurses’ responses to interruptions during medication tasks: A time and motion study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
26
0
15

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
26
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…A majority used time and motion methods ( n = 26) where a range of classifications of nurse activities were used; in 27% ( n = 13) of these studies, multiple dimensions of nursing work were examined. Organisational aspects of nursing work were examined in 31.7% ( n = 13) of studies and included costings, access to resources and satisfaction. Ten of these studies examined multiple dimensions of nursing work. Cognitive nursing work was examined in only 17.1% ( n = 8) of studies; these examined cognitive workload (Colligan, Potts, Finn, & Sinkin, ), interruptions (Probst et al, ; Reed, Minnick, & Dietrich, ), multi‐tasking (Reed et al, ), work sequence (Cornell, Riordan, Townsend‐Gervis, & Mobley, ), errors (Cordero, Kuehn, Kumar, & Mekhjian, ; Westbrook, Li, Georgiou, Paoloni, & Cullen, ) and information sources for decision‐making (Asaro & Boxerman, ; Westbrook et al, ; Zadvinskis, Chipps, & Yen, ; Zuzelo, Gettis, Hansell, & Thomas, ) in nursing work. Emotional nursing work was examined in only 12.2% ( n = 5) of studies; all these studies also captured other dimensions of nursing work. Emotional aspects of nursing work included nurses' feelings about the technology and their work (Bennett, Harper‐Femson, Tone, & Rajmohamed, ; Gomes, Hash, Orsolini, Watkins, & Mazzoccoli, ; Kossman & Scheidenhelm, ; Zuzelo et al, ), and providing emotional support to patients (Gomes et al, ) and their families (Schenk et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…A majority used time and motion methods ( n = 26) where a range of classifications of nurse activities were used; in 27% ( n = 13) of these studies, multiple dimensions of nursing work were examined. Organisational aspects of nursing work were examined in 31.7% ( n = 13) of studies and included costings, access to resources and satisfaction. Ten of these studies examined multiple dimensions of nursing work. Cognitive nursing work was examined in only 17.1% ( n = 8) of studies; these examined cognitive workload (Colligan, Potts, Finn, & Sinkin, ), interruptions (Probst et al, ; Reed, Minnick, & Dietrich, ), multi‐tasking (Reed et al, ), work sequence (Cornell, Riordan, Townsend‐Gervis, & Mobley, ), errors (Cordero, Kuehn, Kumar, & Mekhjian, ; Westbrook, Li, Georgiou, Paoloni, & Cullen, ) and information sources for decision‐making (Asaro & Boxerman, ; Westbrook et al, ; Zadvinskis, Chipps, & Yen, ; Zuzelo, Gettis, Hansell, & Thomas, ) in nursing work. Emotional nursing work was examined in only 12.2% ( n = 5) of studies; all these studies also captured other dimensions of nursing work. Emotional aspects of nursing work included nurses' feelings about the technology and their work (Bennett, Harper‐Femson, Tone, & Rajmohamed, ; Gomes, Hash, Orsolini, Watkins, & Mazzoccoli, ; Kossman & Scheidenhelm, ; Zuzelo et al, ), and providing emotional support to patients (Gomes et al, ) and their families (Schenk et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The direct observation method was used to examine a range of technologies in relation to nursing work; a persistent theme was examination of how nurses spent their time. Most common was examination of EMM or physician ordering systems (Ampt & Westbrook, ; Asaro & Boxerman, ; Dwibedi et al, , ; Leung, Chan, Wong, & Law, ; Poon et al, ; Reed et al, ; Westbrook et al, ; Yen et al, ). Next most common was examination of nurses' clinical documentation (Ballermann, Shaw, Arbeau, Mayes, & Noel Gibney, ; Banner & Olney, ; Hurst, ; Ravat et al, ; Schachner et al, ; Wong et al, ) and EMR (Chung et al, ; Hakes & Whittington, ; Korst, Eusebio‐Angeja, Chamorro, Aydin, & Gregory, ; Read‐Brown et al, ; Roumeliotis et al, ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations