2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ocemod.2015.05.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical study of tidal dynamics in the South China Sea with adjoint method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, further effort of assimilating the in situ observations into numerical models in the future is worthwhile in providing more accurate knowledge of the tidal systems in the study area. Since the study area is often chosen as an open boundary in simulating tides in the SCS or Indonesian seas (e. g., Fang et al, 1999;Gao et al, 2015) the observational results of this study are expected to be useful in improving model results.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, further effort of assimilating the in situ observations into numerical models in the future is worthwhile in providing more accurate knowledge of the tidal systems in the study area. Since the study area is often chosen as an open boundary in simulating tides in the SCS or Indonesian seas (e. g., Fang et al, 1999;Gao et al, 2015) the observational results of this study are expected to be useful in improving model results.…”
Section: Summary and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; h is the undisturbed water depth; ζ is the sea surface elevation above the undisturbed sea level; u and v are the velocity components in the east and north, respectively; f is the Coriolis parameter; g is the acceleration due to gravity; k is the BFC; A is the horizontal eddy viscosity coefficient; Δ is the Laplace oper- (Lu & Zhang, 2006;Zhang & Wang, 2014); and  is the adjusted height of equilibrium tide and is calculated following Fang et al (1999) and Gao et al (2015).…”
Section: D Multi-constituent Tidal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in Fang et al (2004), M 2 , S 2 , K 1 , and O 1 are the principal tidal constituents in the BYECS, so these four principal tidal constituents (only M 2 or M 2 and K 1 in some of the following sensitivity experiments) were simulated. Following Gao et al (2015), the 2D multi-constituent tidal model was run for 30 days from 1 January 2010 (16 January 2010, in some of the following sensitivity experiments) with the hydrostatic state (i.e., ζ = u = v = 0), and the initial 15 days was spun up, which is sufficient to separate the simulated four principal tidal constituents (Cao et al, 2015). The adjoint model was run for 15 days backward in time from 31 January 2010 (15 February 2010, in some of the subsequent sensitivity experiments).…”
Section: Model Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much attention has been paid to reducing the simulation errors in many previous researches and the adjoint assimilation method is an effective method to get optimal control variables [14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. Kuroda and Kishi [21] applied the adjoint assimilation technique in a marine ecosystem model to estimate the biological parameters and choose control variables that impacted simulation results mostly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%