2012
DOI: 10.2328/jnds.33.11
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Simulation of the Failure Propagation of Masonry Buildings during an Earthquake

Abstract: The process of failure propagation of masonry buildings during earthquakes is simulated using a refined version of the distinct element method that simulates three-dimensional elastic, failure, and collapse behaviors of structures. Models with a flat roof and models with a vault roof are considered, and their failure propagation mechanisms are examined. The influence of the direction of the input ground motion on failure propagation is also investigated. Moreover, the effectiveness of three reinforcement measu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As demonstrated in Tagel‐Din and Meguro, the Poisson effect is accounted intrinsically by the AEM, whereas the RBSM formulation requires additional DOFs or the spring stiffness manipulation . Finally, unlike the AEM, analysis up to complete collapse of a structure using RBSM is unattainable, since the latter does not consider the recontact between neighbouring elements (if different from the ones initially set), as noted in Bakeer and Furukawa et al In this work, the use of the AEM in the modelling of (CS) masonry walls is further discussed and verified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…As demonstrated in Tagel‐Din and Meguro, the Poisson effect is accounted intrinsically by the AEM, whereas the RBSM formulation requires additional DOFs or the spring stiffness manipulation . Finally, unlike the AEM, analysis up to complete collapse of a structure using RBSM is unattainable, since the latter does not consider the recontact between neighbouring elements (if different from the ones initially set), as noted in Bakeer and Furukawa et al In this work, the use of the AEM in the modelling of (CS) masonry walls is further discussed and verified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Finally, numerical damping is used to model the actual energy dissipation. In dynamics, Rayleigh damping is generally preferred [37,38], including mass-and stiffnessproportional contributions, because it gives constant damping across a relatively wide frequency range. However, only mass-proportional damping is considered here, leading to a reasonable timestep ∆t [38].…”
Section: Numerical Dem Strategy For Dynamic Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A small non-zero value ( ∼ = 0.001) has been used for the friction failure coefficient (Mehrabi and Shing, 1997). Also, the mortar tensile and shear stiffness have been determined using Equations (4) and (5), proposed by Furukawa et al (2012):…”
Section: Numerical Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%