2022
DOI: 10.3390/polym14040666
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Simulation of Impregnation Process of Reactive Injection Pultrusion for Glass Fiber/PA6 Composites

Abstract: Pultrusion of thermoplastic composites has been the hotspot of manufacturing high-performance thermoplastic composites in recent years. The optimization of process parameters in the pultrusion usually needed repeated attempts, which wasted lots of manpower and material resources. A numerical simulation method can accelerate the optimization of process parameters. In this work, the impregnation process of reactive injection pultrusion for glass fiber reinforced nylon 6 (GF/PA6) composites was modeled and numeri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ding et al [ 64 ] divided the impregnation process into two‐phase flow (liquid resin and air), and analyzed the influence of pulling rate and injection pressure on the impregnation time and resin reflux distance, having the following continuity equation and momentum equation: ρt+ρnormalUtrue¯=0, ()normalρtrueU¯tgoodbreak+()normalρtrueU¯trueU¯goodbreak=goodbreak−normalPnormalδgoodbreak+()normalη()trueU¯goodbreak+normalUtrue¯Tgoodbreak−ηKtrueU¯goodbreak+S, where ρ is the average density of liquid resin and air, t is the time, Utrue¯ is the apparent velocity, P is the pressure of impregnation, and η is the average viscosity of liquid resin and air. S is the momentum source term generated by gravity.…”
Section: In Situ Polymerization Pultrusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ding et al [ 64 ] divided the impregnation process into two‐phase flow (liquid resin and air), and analyzed the influence of pulling rate and injection pressure on the impregnation time and resin reflux distance, having the following continuity equation and momentum equation: ρt+ρnormalUtrue¯=0, ()normalρtrueU¯tgoodbreak+()normalρtrueU¯trueU¯goodbreak=goodbreak−normalPnormalδgoodbreak+()normalη()trueU¯goodbreak+normalUtrue¯Tgoodbreak−ηKtrueU¯goodbreak+S, where ρ is the average density of liquid resin and air, t is the time, Utrue¯ is the apparent velocity, P is the pressure of impregnation, and η is the average viscosity of liquid resin and air. S is the momentum source term generated by gravity.…”
Section: In Situ Polymerization Pultrusionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where P is the pressure of impregnation, z is the coordinate axis coinciding with the pulling direction, and U z is fluid motion speed along the longitudinal axis. Ding et al [64] divided the impregnation process into two-phase flow (liquid resin and air), and analyzed the influence of pulling rate and injection pressure on the impregnation time and resin reflux distance, having the following continuity equation and momentum equation:…”
Section: Impregnationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, some experimental and theoretical investigations for acquiring a profound comprehension of the pultrusion process (containing the impregnation, temperature distribution and pulling force etc.) can be found in references 9–17. It is noted that the temperature gradients induced by the exothermic reaction of the reactive thermoplastic matrices take place during processing, and bring out the shrinkage, mechanical properties degradation and thermal expansion 18,19 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%