2015
DOI: 10.21608/jesaun.2015.115148
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical Modelling Stability Analyses of Haulage Drift in Deep Underground Mines

Abstract: Mine haulage drifts are the arteries of a mine. They are used for the transportation of blasted ore from the draw point to nearby ore pass or dumping point in deep underground mines. Thus, they must be remained functional during their service life. Otherwise, their instability could lead to serious consequences such as injuries, delay of production and increased operational cost. The objective of this paper is to evaluate the performance stability of mine haulage drifts with respect to mining step adopting num… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noted in several studies that the common practice in underground rock engineering problems relating to factor of safety (FS), is to consider the values of FS > 1 as representing the stable conditions for an underground excavation; while FS = 1, represents the critical state between stable and unstable conditions, and the values of FS < 1, is considered as "failed" conditions for the excavation (Zhang and Mitri 2008;Abdellah 2013;Itasca 2014). However, as a more conservative approach due to ever present uncertainties, the critical threshold for the factor of safety is considered to be 1.3 or 1.4 instead of unity in multiple studies (Abdellah 2015, Nuang et al, 2018Liang et al, 2019).…”
Section: Strength-to-stress Ratio (Factor Of Safety)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…It is noted in several studies that the common practice in underground rock engineering problems relating to factor of safety (FS), is to consider the values of FS > 1 as representing the stable conditions for an underground excavation; while FS = 1, represents the critical state between stable and unstable conditions, and the values of FS < 1, is considered as "failed" conditions for the excavation (Zhang and Mitri 2008;Abdellah 2013;Itasca 2014). However, as a more conservative approach due to ever present uncertainties, the critical threshold for the factor of safety is considered to be 1.3 or 1.4 instead of unity in multiple studies (Abdellah 2015, Nuang et al, 2018Liang et al, 2019).…”
Section: Strength-to-stress Ratio (Factor Of Safety)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Literature is rich of studies using strength-to-stress ratio or the factor of safety in various domains of underground stability analysis (Zhang and Goh 2012;Idris 2014;Abdellah 2015;Shnorhokian et al, 2015Shnorhokian et al, , 2018Heidarzadeh et al, 2018aHeidarzadeh et al, , 2018bHeidarzadeh et al, , 2019Naung et al, 2018;Liang et al, 2019).…”
Section: Strength-to-stress Ratio (Factor Of Safety)mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Floor heave is one of the focuses concerned by scholars at home and abroad [1][2][3][4][5][6][7]. A series of dynamic phenomena [8][9][10][11] such as roadway instability and floor water inrush are caused by floor heave, which not only affect mine ventilation, transportation, and pedestrians but also increase a lot of maintenance workload and mining costs [12,13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%