2008
DOI: 10.1007/s10704-008-9292-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical modelling of concrete beams reinforced with pre-stressed CFRP

Abstract: In this paper, a numerical simulation is presented on the behaviour of concrete beams, reinforced with pre-stressed CFRP. The numerical results are compared to experimental results. Nonlinear material behaviour is considered, namely: the inelastic compressive concrete behaviour, the elasto-plastic behaviour of steel reinforced bars, the bond-slip relationship between the concrete and the internal steel reinforced bars, the mode-II fracture interface between the concrete and the pre-stressed CFRP and concrete c… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) P. Neto [9] and others analyzed and compared the test results of prestressed CFRP reinforced concrete beams by using the numerical simulation, the simulation was conducted with the method of discrete fracture modeling, at the same time, using the method of non linear iterative sequence in order to avoid causing problems such as convergence, finally the results of numerical simulation tally well with the test results.…”
Section: The Current Research Status Of Related Fields At Home and Abmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…(2) P. Neto [9] and others analyzed and compared the test results of prestressed CFRP reinforced concrete beams by using the numerical simulation, the simulation was conducted with the method of discrete fracture modeling, at the same time, using the method of non linear iterative sequence in order to avoid causing problems such as convergence, finally the results of numerical simulation tally well with the test results.…”
Section: The Current Research Status Of Related Fields At Home and Abmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Yet, e.g. the mentioned Newton-Raphson may not rely on existence of some potentials and then such a fully implicit scheme can be considered, even for p > 1 since the last term in (29) and its estimation (35) below would be avoided.…”
Section: Coupled Implicit Time Discretisationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially the former option is explicitly reported in literature as unreliable in the context of damage or phase-field crack models, cf. [6,13,35,44,48,49], although one can even find an opposite (not correct in general) belief and a (rather particular) experience that a fully coupled monolithic solution can even prevent numerical instabilities or converges, cf. e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result in finite element analysis is shown as dashed lines in Figure 13, which match well with the experiment result with a difference of 2.18% in mid-span and 6.36% in L/4 section. The difference is supposed to be due to the simplification of the model, for example, no relative slippage between concrete and reinforcement was considered [36], and the material constitutive equations were simplified as well. However, the difference is really small, so the finite element analysis model is considered to have been validated.…”
Section: Displacement and Stiffnessmentioning
confidence: 99%