2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0272-7714(02)00355-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Numerical modeling of tides in the Great Bay Estuarine System: dynamical balance and spring–neap residual modulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where N is the number of measurements and n is the index of the given data point. Similarly, the normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) between the field and model data was calculated using Equation 2 (McLaughlin et al 2003):…”
Section: Water Surface Elevation Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where N is the number of measurements and n is the index of the given data point. Similarly, the normalized root mean square error (NRMSE) between the field and model data was calculated using Equation 2 (McLaughlin et al 2003):…”
Section: Water Surface Elevation Statistical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The governing equations of the original model depended only upon this balance of forces. To accommodate deeper channels and meteorological forcing, the model has since evolved to include local acceleration, wind stress, and the opportunity to include a depth dependent bottom friction coefficient in the governing equations (McLaughlin et al 2003). When the water elevation in a given element reaches below a threshold level of 0.5 m, local acceleration is ignored, significantly speeding the computation where grid spacing is smallest.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where H is total depth of the water column, Q = HV is the volumetric flux, V is the depth averaged velocity, g is gravitational acceleration, ζ is surface elevation relative to mean sea level, C d is the bottom drag coefficient, and W is the kinematic wind stress (see also McLaughlin et al, 2003). These equations may be rearranged to eliminate Q and produce a nonlinear diffusion equation.…”
Section: Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The non-linear system of governing equations of the model is solved iteratively at each time step. The reader is referred to [4] for the standard governing equations and detailed solution schemes. Lagrangian particle tracking is performed by advecting particles in the simulated Eulerian velocity field utilizing a 4 th order Runge-Kutta (RK) scheme at the end of each hydrodynamic model time step.…”
Section: Numerical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%